X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:reply-to:subject:to:references:from:message-id
	:date:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=default; b=r9KzBY47C/pwbUn3
	wxd7qPHr5WD5YB1Cd3MvbHJUUrblCOgk7gD7rgOFvxzbYd+UnCDyfPd1VMX1QkHK
	+r/quRud3ouG5hJfZNj+hDI8Eqijey+6/aDyuv2V1oHMfHXTueAV04WoU+Cg13Ae
	+xt+1qIA5gg6pjr8IHGKKRdHSWY=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:reply-to:subject:to:references:from:message-id
	:date:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=KV2ZtNEDMPwMso53RGGTn/
	/d/IA=; b=SRDOzshjjbST22EMFc+qLLDoQaQcIPy4KtdETrltRobK+h8X34PfdY
	roCJkmOByDwO42bNUcUVN2NDDNvNFkM61y139A/Ioq4gmQTkPoOinRVl5455Sqb/
	oddIJvH1WKpDK3go3rypY4DNkvP2QwQoPGkVQ5yNRwGNq2ZKqEtrg=
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=0.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=no version=3.3.2 spammy=H*R:D*ca, announcement, cygcheck, Canada
X-HELO: smtp-out-no.shaw.ca
X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.2 cv=HahkdmM8 c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=MVEHjbUiAHxQW0jfcDq5EA==:117 a=MVEHjbUiAHxQW0jfcDq5EA==:17 a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10 a=7F7WyIqSGmnx8FvzPv8A:9 a=Q0MBdRXxtCxV692T:21 a=o_kWgAYUXqhN1esR:21 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10
Reply-To: Brian DOT Inglis AT SystematicSw DOT ab DOT ca
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] lz4 1.7.5-1
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References: <553d0edf-2de0-316f-ee7f-0d0fc2753e8c AT cegetel DOT net>
From: Brian Inglis <Brian DOT Inglis AT SystematicSw DOT ab DOT ca>
Message-ID: <80e15d3e-db8b-1384-2e1a-b172e6b07468@SystematicSw.ab.ca>
Date: Sun, 1 Oct 2017 12:54:08 -0600
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <553d0edf-2de0-316f-ee7f-0d0fc2753e8c@cegetel.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-CMAE-Envelope: MS4wfI7zHisPt1690+XbaW1y4YWWInZbqzGQKUqou2lN0Iw5yDbFgZgKgm1m5pgxxMLiSCcALffY3TumQ1NMMYG897vG15266T8hPR3iox8Po8PpbEYZ1gqi YZrAJ/Z+Pg0B21woOGEOOy7KauQDMX7Vns44lMwdMIPMtW/3PaD4eIkjuWCvjhlGQOkoWwSh6N+WeQ==
X-IsSubscribed: yes

On 2017-10-01 10:31, S. Loiseau wrote:
> On Sun, 03 Sep 2017 21:02:44 -0500, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote:
>> The following packages have been uploaded to the Cygwin distribution:
>>
>> * liblz4_1-1.7.5-1
> 
> My setup-x86_64 (version 2.881 from 2017-07-05) does not upgrade to this new 
> version.
> My liblz4_1 is at version 131-1 and setup propose to "Keep" it. It does not 
> appear on "Pending" view.
> 
> Maybe some comparison inside setup.exe think that "1.7.5-1" <= "131-1" ?
> 
> Other updates were proposed and executed.
> Version 1.7.5-1 is proposed by clicking 3 times on "Keep" (after "Reinstall"
> and "Uninstall").
> 
> Below the setup.ini part, showing 1.7.5-1 as "Current" and 131-1 as "Prev"
>
> # This file was automatically generated at 2017-09-30 05:38:39 UTC.
> release: cygwin
> arch: x86_64
> setup-timestamp: 1506749919
> setup-version: 2.881
> 
> @ liblz4_1
> sdesc: "LZ4 de/compressor"
> version: 1.7.5-1
> install: x86_64/release/lz4/liblz4_1/liblz4_1-1.7.5-1.tar.xz 30408
> source: x86_64/release/lz4/lz4-1.7.5-1-src.tar.xz 210608
> [prev]
> version: 131-1
> install: x86_64/release/lz4/liblz4_1/liblz4_1-131-1.tar.xz 17924
> source: x86_64/release/lz4/lz4-131-1-src.tar.xz 136668

Version number format changes often require manual intervention to upgrade, as
in this case.

> Output of cygcheck -s -r -v attached.
> 
> Thank you for the great tool!

Cygwin setup developers are testing a new upgrade approach.
Can any of the setup developers comment on whether that will fix this issue?

-- 
Take care. Thanks, Brian Inglis, Calgary, Alberta, Canada

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple