X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:from:to:subject:date:message-id:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; q=dns; s=default; b=UtV RAbj4YHTaTNR5FcHiAMxrHO9/oa3yWcBvU5/GVkl55bDZrueHcoBgO2bm+mnLFBB 9pSzRv1w3sCVcfkuOZlj1Rw73E0gl0PvweyXKy7rIcH/qsMnrIUu7RcFChpAQ4V0 sd1MyxVReE794WzTYSPDQNpBzGY8d+Zqm/TDL358= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:from:to:subject:date:message-id:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; s=default; bh=fxqZf7czr OV2wXfNiMOJw5JKLEw=; b=uZWx/ZqY5rf73Jw7mvcSc4upxwDbJRnWwOgh/UKSD w3IzmqcFautTCB0lC41XDmcEeYybXpVbEjDfZmxzV6WGfRoQht4Q3uL6ofYDqzDS t0A9roTvDgUXHZh97kZnf5ZIb2HvrGnuuYOiNJDEDHTZvEDgO/VNH+NNtdQIeHMR 0w= Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=1.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50,CYGWIN_OWNER_BODY,GIT_PATCH_2,KAM_INFOUSMEBIZ,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=no version=3.3.2 spammy=H*MI:local, delivers, H*M:local, Moreover X-HELO: mailrelay.dillinger.de From: "PAULUS, Raimund, TI-ABN" To: "cygwin AT cygwin DOT com" Subject: Re: RPC clnt_create() adress already in use Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2017 08:25:32 +0000 Message-ID: <59D90AF8D70E9740907BACDE2BCB52083663B2F2@RESW102.resdom01.local> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-IsSubscribed: yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id v8T8QOCn018542 Hello Mark, i downloaded the sources of libtirpc from this url: https://sourceforge.net/projects/libtirpc/files/libtirpc/1.0.1/ and unpacked it in the local subdirectory libtirpc-1.0.1. I had to make the following changes: libtirpc-1.0.1/src/clnt_bcast.c (because POLLRDNORM, POLLRDBAND are already defined in /usr/include/sys/poll.h) : --> #ifndef POLLRDNORM --> # define POLLRDNORM 0x040 /* Normal data may be read. */ --> # define POLLRDBAND 0x080 /* Priority data may be read. */ --> #endif libtirpc-1.0.1/tirpc/rpc/xdr.h (typedefs where missed): --> #include --> typedef __uint64_t u_quad_t; --> typedef __int64_t quad_t; I linked the necessary source files with my testprogram: gcc -D__GLIBC__ -D__linux__ -I/c/dh-progs/tstdir/libtirpc-1.0.1/tirpc \ tst_rpc.c \ /c/dh-progs/tstdir/libtirpc-1.0.1/src/clnt_bcast.c \ /c/dh-progs/tstdir/libtirpc-1.0.1/src/clnt_dg.c \ /c/dh-progs/tstdir/libtirpc-1.0.1/src/clnt_generic.c \ /c/dh-progs/tstdir/libtirpc-1.0.1/src/clnt_perror.c \ /c/dh-progs/tstdir/libtirpc-1.0.1/src/clnt_vc.c \ /c/dh-progs/tstdir/libtirpc-1.0.1/src/rpc_callmsg.c \ /c/dh-progs/tstdir/libtirpc-1.0.1/src/rpc_commondata.c \ /c/dh-progs/tstdir/libtirpc-1.0.1/src/rpc_generic.c \ /c/dh-progs/tstdir/libtirpc-1.0.1/src/rpc_prot.c \ /c/dh-progs/tstdir/libtirpc-1.0.1/src/rpcb_clnt.c \ /c/dh-progs/tstdir/libtirpc-1.0.1/src/rpcb_prot.c \ /c/dh-progs/tstdir/libtirpc-1.0.1/src/xdr.c \ /c/dh-progs/tstdir/libtirpc-1.0.1/src/xdr_array.c \ /c/dh-progs/tstdir/libtirpc-1.0.1/src/xdr_mem.c \ /c/dh-progs/tstdir/libtirpc-1.0.1/src/xdr_rec.c \ /c/dh-progs/tstdir/libtirpc-1.0.1/src/xdr_reference.c \ /c/dh-progs/tstdir/libtirpc-1.0.1/src/getnetconfig.c \ /c/dh-progs/tstdir/libtirpc-1.0.1/src/getnetpath.c \ /c/dh-progs/tstdir/libtirpc-1.0.1/src/auth_none.c \ /c/dh-progs/tstdir/libtirpc-1.0.1/src/auth_unix.c \ /c/dh-progs/tstdir/libtirpc-1.0.1/src/authunix_prot.c \ /c/dh-progs/tstdir/libtirpc-1.0.1/src/mt_misc.c \ /c/dh-progs/tstdir/libtirpc-1.0.1/src/debug.c \ -o tst_rpc-libtirpc-1-0-1 The program works perfectly (no errors is test cases 1 and 2). I assume, there must be a difference between the downloaded lib-files and the Cygwin-libtirpc. Raimund Paulus -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com [mailto:cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com] Im Auftrag von Mark Geisert Gesendet: Mittwoch, 27. September 2017 11:50 An: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Betreff: Re: RPC clnt_create() adress already in use Hello Raimund, Let's keep this on the mailing list please. PAULUS, Raimund, TI-ABN wrote: > Hallo Mark Geisert, > > many thanks for your answer. I supposed this too. > > I included in my source code the following function calls after clnt_create(): > > int fd = 0; > bool bool_ret = clnt_control(cl, CLGET_FD, &fd); if(bool_ret == true) { > printf("fd: %d\n", fd); > > int enable = 1; > retval = setsockopt(fd, SOL_SOCKET, SO_REUSEADDR, &enable, sizeof(int)); > if(retval < 0) > fprintf(stderr, "Fehler setsockopt(): %s\n", strerror(errno)); } > > The function clnt_control() delivers the socket of the RPC-Client-Handle. > The result is the same as before. Moreover i think, the effect of setsockopt() would be valid only during the process is running (my test scenarios 1 and 2). > But it wouldn't change anything regarding my test scenario 3 (several restarts). > > Raimund I looked through the libtirpc source code and nowhere is SO_REUSEADDR being set. You are on the right track with how to do it, but by the time clnt_create() returns to you it is already too late. As far as I can tell there is no way to get access to the socket between the time it's created within libtirpc and the time it's made available to you by clnt_create(). I did try running your testcase (thanks for supplying that) but I don't have a local machine running RPC services and don't wish to poke at random machines on the Internet ;-). I had to compile it as so: gcc -g -o test_rpc -I/usr/include/tirpc test_rpc.c -ltirpc You are taking care to compile against the correct RPC-package includes and link against the correct RPC-package libraries, yes? Speculation: There might be a way to decompose what clnt_create() does into other libtirpc functions that accomplish the same thing, but in smaller pieces such that you could set the socket option before bind() is called. That would be a fair amount of work though and given my cursory look at the source I don't know if it's even possible. ..mark -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple