X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type; q=dns; s=default; b=eK4R pNBQQgQZ1scpbQdFsXi2DJYpeLxSca0eEOuL9J0XJciPL3EJV6uTYUwgSV5b8gbt cJLGerhO1MYsWNs5NrFij8358X74bTvl70Y0sIcCWN7yIiwvfg9RdprW88Glg04I O8XB/9q8Mju+D6sFDVbRuZXSJpiay6bPPHZ+Xws= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type; s=default; bh=SZdBm376Gb N2efnJYgKihRiJ1z0=; b=a6Ys/bq0UUW1vf0sB5kLqoxtkUHcFNv/iOYRpEEcG6 +YoyWfCgv+1RvecgZBQCM2m1Zg/ePelaVT5aHBhRv/y7Zwxss54XopYjGUcZ949e PWG4G4SX6t2ApwkHc8lCvI7xc/mJs6vescGXTWBltTYEDbixtEz08P+OweENe4ZF o= Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=no version=3.3.2 spammy=H*M:cygwin, Hx-languages-length:504, 0002, HAuthentication-Results:cygwin.com X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mx1.redhat.com 2A0F65D5EA Authentication-Results: ext-mx10.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=cygwin.com Authentication-Results: ext-mx10.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=yselkowitz AT cygwin DOT com DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 mx1.redhat.com 2A0F65D5EA Subject: Re: cygwin-2.9.0-3 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: From: Yaakov Selkowitz Message-ID: <1cf91c81-4797-222d-bde9-631219b02d00@cygwin.com> Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2017 22:55:51 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="71anJhtWjSb5Ipo9FuNTxDlslOGaVadNB" X-IsSubscribed: yes --71anJhtWjSb5Ipo9FuNTxDlslOGaVadNB Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="5ncvtSa9pT8ilAmOGLi74f5G9N3ep0aVI"; protected-headers="v1" From: Yaakov Selkowitz To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Message-ID: <1cf91c81-4797-222d-bde9-631219b02d00 AT cygwin DOT com> Subject: Re: cygwin-2.9.0-3 References: In-Reply-To: --5ncvtSa9pT8ilAmOGLi74f5G9N3ep0aVI Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-CA Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 2017-09-13 16:25, Denis Excoffier wrote: > (sorry to start a new thread, i was unable to obtain the raw text of the = announcement message for 2.9.0-3 (some error in the message-id?) in order t= o make a reply) >=20 > I tried to build 2.9.0-3 (x86) with GCC 5.4.0 (my current GCC) and failed= because the #pragma's introduced in the patch #0002 are lexically unok und= er GCC 5.4.0. Our GCC was updated to 6.4.0 shortly before this release. That is what you should be using now. --=20 Yaakov --5ncvtSa9pT8ilAmOGLi74f5G9N3ep0aVI-- --71anJhtWjSb5Ipo9FuNTxDlslOGaVadNB Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iHQEARECADQWIQRFYAu5jKh4qpenARn/IK+aZu4flAUCWbn9xxYceXNlbGtvd2l0 ekBjeWd3aW4uY29tAAoJEP8gr5pm7h+Up8gAnRxvWYvAbGuXHAwRIRN39YJEmSWj AJ497M3pTJBenyIxyc2PgOLpPrQATA== =Fegy -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --71anJhtWjSb5Ipo9FuNTxDlslOGaVadNB--