X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:reply-to:subject:to:references:from:message-id
	:date:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=default; b=K2JjUiULz0eNASq0
	xOcjpq1VncHxGGW9PiJGNdRAs8tOqsQYquFvNV/f56U43S8VxnHenr1uOpwzFJf3
	ZoWGfZC+BDs2aXO20FIqCj0878CPjnaIMMUI6Y2jAb1OvgHgFqXpKj3uG9Lj4Pn9
	kpdVTDjDK9uoKA0CToo9zNXoqV8=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:reply-to:subject:to:references:from:message-id
	:date:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=ZK5eeGDXjHiYL0V/72JMjw
	LeOOo=; b=k0R5Qt7RnKzoYjBdSSHSyQpS1XiHvQ1FW56iW7ntCJJY0RJ0DpSmBx
	J0ZXqD0NdKII6LZnSa7Qp3QH33m8sYDfdQT8IEUVl1SAUvjOOSdH8HTgJrAmhyQB
	PzHtt4yGjshIstm/n4hdd9XnhXA/sJOZz+LbMoyRtUd+nbcYCvkkM=
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=no version=3.3.2 spammy=Panel, panel
X-HELO: smtp-out-so.shaw.ca
X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.2 cv=Qc8WhoTv c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=MVEHjbUiAHxQW0jfcDq5EA==:117 a=MVEHjbUiAHxQW0jfcDq5EA==:17 a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10 a=iFNgFaLN_bzhSECwVZsA:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10
Reply-To: Brian DOT Inglis AT SystematicSw DOT ab DOT ca
Subject: Re: how to access and display apps that I've launched
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References: <1783227004 DOT 4348461 DOT 1500934105434 DOT ref AT mail DOT yahoo DOT com> <1783227004 DOT 4348461 DOT 1500934105434 AT mail DOT yahoo DOT com> <6df51dae-d669-913e-887c-50ad264fc1df AT cornell DOT edu> <8ddfe9d9-9745-1937-fff6-9ab172b5c472 AT SystematicSw DOT ab DOT ca> <87tw20nzzx DOT fsf AT Rainer DOT invalid>
From: Brian Inglis <Brian DOT Inglis AT SystematicSw DOT ab DOT ca>
Message-ID: <a588ade0-0d2c-d916-23ca-e7ea24b728be@SystematicSw.ab.ca>
Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2017 13:57:31 -0600
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.2.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <87tw20nzzx.fsf@Rainer.invalid>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-CMAE-Envelope: MS4wfOwUSKakBdAMWYL8ynOl+uipArq72bJ2iY2SF3a7+O1TliNAqlXQn4yHtkZHtUWYFbc1Hq7vorepLo0YV6bp16ZpfwNSY+KwqNWxq/2D4VZEA4+A8EGr 1F/sZE2UchqMaSsk/VzzTeBQSzNGhzZBNaWQHBcEliW8PfiwMEECEDF6I78jIHx6G1S+eWUtXcasmQ==
X-IsSubscribed: yes

On 2017-07-25 12:16, Achim Gratz wrote:
> Brian Inglis writes:
>> rebaselst uses touch -t 7001010000 ... - could be patched to 197001010000.
> 
> Could be, but touch is specified to assume "19" yhen YY=70 by POSIX, AFAIK.
> 
>> Is this affected by locale and by Windows regional date settings in Control
>> Panel/Region/Formats tab/Additional settings... button/Date tab/Calendar
>> group/When a two-digit year is entered, interpret it as a year between
>> |(nnnn-99)| and [nnnn ^v] with the default values |1980| and [2079 ^v] i.e. from
>> the start of the DOS epoch which postdates the Unix epoch 19700101, and could
>> cause 70 to be interpreted as 2070.
> 
> That would be surprising since the expectation really is UNIX epoch when
> we're talking about Cygwin.  In any case, the OP should easily be able
> to test this at the shell prompt.

I know POSIX says and my tests on current releases verify 1969-99, 2000-68, but
could this be thrown off by localization interfering in some cases, as was
/proc/loadavg, because a function started using locales?
These files and related functions do not seem candidates to be affected by the
recent patch for ls problems with symlinks, so BLODA blocking pre-1980 times?

-- 
Take care. Thanks, Brian Inglis, Calgary, Alberta, Canada

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple