X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=default; b=xiugAKurV0Kn+1KK /xamffkidQtGTDJ4Db45AAwKd21HdI1rI0I07AyX0YoY+tplEGcHWvVKb19BAyBt a8hcF9/LnZnk6kK5O0RzBeDxoC8O8RJ2/jZXVLQ0eoucXvAzcb44tngLIWC1QVNy ykXwEFf+8ab/lWSCeSoxmUpPpN0= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=nmOhJqH5+0hognK9yHItRG rXACA=; b=TQ7H+Dx6OmflDC2PmIK/2COP4xKNlQHVEi6odmJ7voxMMeyXTg8uWa 0JZgx8POLvbbV7EyGjXz7/uI8zRBEsqfmEhX67gDQ82gZVkEkcxVYOTWsCtpQtU4 4/hCLE/s2r8obWik8DIc6NMeI+9RYwi8SZ7MemxGJVbdRbNwTdNfs= Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy= X-HELO: mail-wm0-f51.google.com X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=vGvRhpOuIA6M2k7WXe8x7zvG1DhF5jwD7A6/5EACGnU=; b=bZAqua5a7CLzrZyTSXkdI8oUkyFs4Umk9dXE2OwUh14X/rVakItzevGemlmifY3pOW dMAjuLrHI63JGQr+UYNTJ+lPA3ABpmztRkjCgDO8yzDsL2dyrv8NwxfWcmgKpXs9xm6E LA1Oy2XpeuR53rgsVmxmcg2qNWS9gFtW51Ep/6PLgdhawgJ8VyqPwJMhU/t70RONprIz c2+Vh4PG8pEozBQ7AiebM4eoWVlA0dRU0VN8ESRFtViqQUNbpFQ+1EZydaBOTUt6o5Gv RyLRi6EJt7g4wZ2KhbQw77SeJt4W2Fk9g1/bFQTnTBQLcwzRQJrGrt5Xvnywueg6S54O iNDg== X-Gm-Message-State: AIVw1139DGnSTVuRVtUh0E3J1T0kqPGb6rp3gyYmog+v4coltIkhOniR cPyhyKXlXzcMKQ5/3s4= X-Received: by 10.28.65.138 with SMTP id o132mr8534536wma.81.1500992974783; Tue, 25 Jul 2017 07:29:34 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: "rebase-trigger full" To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <6951c29a-a869-3da9-6f28-70e441ed0dce AT onetel DOT com> <467d8e79-6a72-b7ad-8c2c-9ac282f1ac45 AT SystematicSw DOT ab DOT ca> <2abf5d73-74d5-e1b8-0fa8-f346b1af8685 AT onetel DOT com> From: Marco Atzeri Message-ID: <27503828-70f4-aad6-2e04-408676108403@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2017 16:29:30 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <2abf5d73-74d5-e1b8-0fa8-f346b1af8685@onetel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes On 25/07/2017 16:12, mike wrote: > On 25/07/2017 11:17, mike wrote: >> On 25/07/2017 06:21, Brian Inglis wrote: >> > Thanks very much for that Brian. That seems to have done the trick. > It's solved part of my problems anyway. However why does rebasing take > such a long time? I would have thought that it would be quite fast > using oldschool compile/link/load techniques. I'm not being critical I'm > just curious because a long time ago I used to work on stuff like this > myself. > Hi Mike, "full" take long as need to rebase from scratch every single dll's. It is only needed in case of problems. If you want to know how many dll's are rebased : $ rebase -si |wc -l The usual rebase pass is incremental and it is much faster. Regards Marco -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple