X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=default; b=VpbIEkOOV1Ew9Qq/ Yk612OZjG064m7jaO2PfX9gKg4ZBNwprPIdnVMYk8jwNXq0EaPQSo9XXD1vZX09E FDBBxKUFvCcadprf8PSfYF6pU0gk28klxgvX87EpTCe0g4l8RqPPDecSGZCymbzD 6l3W5pxWa0wAGCERHAVVWJChEZE= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=X1bwrplTt7KUxH4Y0o7SgY jr+Gk=; b=mMkq2b0ag03OmSHT7bA8wNVQf8xWmhyDncUOEn7bjI+ntGkwa8coGe BpjfApt1Ma63GsRILdt0UljZDDFlcUa7evjk8VG2P217VKZMjRBb6X94ALu2xoW4 eK0QIdee0yvCzpJUWxQ+LPC5LmK8rbp5cnkvjm6MuSYf/V1P+eJjc= Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=no version=3.3.2 spammy=H*F:D*t-online.de, H*r:sk:mailout X-HELO: mailout01.t-online.de Subject: Re: CR-LF handling behavior of SED changed recently - this breaks a lot of MinGW cross build scripts To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <0F7D3B1B3C4B894D824F5B822E3E5A175B2636E4 AT IRSMSX103 DOT ger DOT corp DOT intel DOT com> <0F7D3B1B3C4B894D824F5B822E3E5A175B26CE47 AT IRSMSX102 DOT ger DOT corp DOT intel DOT com> <59399CC5 DOT 60900 AT tlinx DOT org> <417f84ac-5d9f-dc50-e912-973e90b8a128 AT redhat DOT com> <0F7D3B1B3C4B894D824F5B822E3E5A175B26F278 AT IRSMSX102 DOT ger DOT corp DOT intel DOT com> <34b26965-34c2-b5f0-a3f2-b2c3df344b08 AT gmail DOT com> <0F7D3B1B3C4B894D824F5B822E3E5A175B270518 AT IRSMSX102 DOT ger DOT corp DOT intel DOT com> <5313de97-d9bd-d9c9-cb4a-254a3eadcf4a AT redhat DOT com> From: =?UTF-8?Q?Hans-Bernhard_Br=c3=b6ker?= Message-ID: <893c8632-1ddf-720b-7009-7e50c5f1ab0d@t-online.de> Date: Sat, 10 Jun 2017 16:21:48 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.1.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Am 10.06.2017 um 15:48 schrieb cyg Simple: > Uhm, 'wt' and 'wb' came from MS itself. GNU GCC was adapted to allow it > and just ignores it on systems that don't need it. Not really. Only "wt" is a DOS-/Windows-ism, while "wb" is part of the standard library, and has been ever since there has been a standard. -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple