X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:reply-to:subject:to:references:from:message-id :date:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=default; b=Nbhb1qD9LoItY1dT 9wpVjidJ35i8js0nLE2XsIYjqK5SFHAiBNF1y5+31YqR4n536k+Lv6bF5jOVeuy6 XM/th16tI6GI9Ht/bbtsFNaCUCqRbIQV4uV1rtWC56lE0TDdHJ9UjTBb6SEaqyCL ltloI0Zvc7wFVF+zZohbIownKI4= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:reply-to:subject:to:references:from:message-id :date:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=Ts8ukmgxR0mIr/fsR7Whf+ 1X1sY=; b=jo6LHyU03OR3qPvgRjeoM8w+wMAvkNwhN7NI+FkIfgbFiVV2ocxzc/ quqCaYzi8pznID7717+IKYmLByG761kSfFAxlyhqY5YvYHbm9cHQL9Buu9atpQ2Q eOk26PQfT+6vTpw4oY6X/k34h4bYOzNElgtUJbExi9UkKGtH8aPhM= Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=no version=3.3.2 spammy=H*f:sk:d4460eb, H*i:sk:d4460eb, products, visit X-HELO: smtp-out-no.shaw.ca X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.2 cv=a+JAzQaF c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=WqCeCkldcEjBO3QZneQsCg==:117 a=WqCeCkldcEjBO3QZneQsCg==:17 a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10 a=pc8JYbbqIT6PIvJmhhEA:9 a=7Zwj6sZBwVKJAoWSPKxL6X1jA+E=:19 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 Reply-To: Brian DOT Inglis AT SystematicSw DOT ab DOT ca Subject: Re: Clueless! sshd ONLY fails at system startup (XP/SP3) -- FOLLOWUP To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <20c9be1102ad4e7590b837c068d3f0ba AT xs4all DOT nl> From: Brian Inglis Message-ID: <280fdefd-c77c-1b75-7191-af541c8c781e@SystematicSw.ab.ca> Date: Fri, 26 May 2017 01:51:38 -0600 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.1.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-CMAE-Envelope: MS4wfCkrcwJVKx/MYfX3NLgenS7WdGR5KgsM4rk+w56B5m/UsZn/ZWu7GiuySw2Q9IpnFHxymo/sX0mTmdDds8d3b82eaYqZ9JDBelU+3rk9BYm4e9kXAekO slX/N+QMyDevw6RZkkUuD8KKHMzKjhbwrsfyguQNgjioejzxW6uyApZo4HhBRlAVQJ7aUzSJEeE/jw== X-IsSubscribed: yes On 2017-05-26 00:23, Houder wrote: > On 2017-05-25 23:21, Houder wrote: >> On 2017-05-25 17:36, Houder wrote: >>> YES, I know, XP is NOT supported anymore ... However, I started >>> out on XP ... and it has sshd running as a Window service, >>> installed and configured (as approved by Corinna :-) >>> ... some time ago I may have upgraded openssh over there (yes, I >>> am now running W7) ... I cannot really remember. Yes, sometimes I >>> visit (ssh) the "old station" (XP) for info that I am missing. >>> (both machines are behind a firewall - rest assured) >>> "Suddenly" (yesterday?) I noticed that the "sshd daemon" fails; >>> it is started at system startup (i.e. an automatic service). >> Ahem ... it should have rephrased that ... however, from the error >> report in the sshd.log, it should be clear that the daemon fails as >> soon as it receives its first "ssh" request ... (and not before). > Give me a break! > Just now I decided to UNinstall the F-Secure anti-virus ... > And guess what ...? Yes, NOW sshd replies again to requests after system > startup! > Now I wonder if I will find the same result on W7 when I install openssh. > (yes, W7 also has F-Secure anti-virus installed). > Anyone using F-Secure on W7 and operating the sshd? For Win7 MS Defender, MS Security Essentials (MSE - free MS download), and Windows Firewall were not BLODAs for me, all others were, but you still have to open up required ports in routers, Firewall, and any security products, and/or enable apps to receive. It can be a pain. Does F-n-Secure have firewall or port block features - many have? Allow port 22 in (or your selection, and from selected hosts or networks, if it can be limited). -- Take care. Thanks, Brian Inglis, Calgary, Alberta, Canada -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple