X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:content-type:to:subject:references:date :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:from:message-id :in-reply-to; q=dns; s=default; b=ByytUDs4msAK7ELqeSv+8Z/CZbWlmn ZCvqbQPiMWEFkQNpvlBKDr7dhwqKKkwoFCOMmMvdmDhhqZf9mhGH9mbrMDh6owmJ P192pVwJLKAn2sa3OY9LLXia0zleZIV1M/TX0+/hSC2Ho7vZC2qorxC1taysLCNK 48ym4pCshPPcs= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:content-type:to:subject:references:date :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:from:message-id :in-reply-to; s=default; bh=3tPN+/p/HFxAI5SIt5o1wcLrKjQ=; b=uo/d hl4MWaGZU0tEgLi2cw0igW8qDHen0ofPjC+iNVAVUNLSbFdEicE+AslskCdNijxa AEvTNQZj2T0VpDEV0uYg2h57ORfm8UyigxTAv+1p9lIwigJUw1e747CvUhyOUut9 Pgs6yWzs6DNIweUEr7Vojx+nZvCPNeuwi7wK6UE= Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=2.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=no version=3.3.2 spammy=lacking, H*Ad:D*t-online.de, H*F:D*t-online.de, HX-HELO:sk:mailout X-HELO: mailout05.t-online.de Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed; delsp=yes To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Apache rebase trouble References: <877f17jxua DOT fsf AT Rainer DOT invalid> <87poezibkr DOT fsf AT Rainer DOT invalid> Date: Wed, 24 May 2017 00:59:25 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: "Michael Lemke" Message-ID: In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Opera Mail/10.63 (Win32) X-IsSubscribed: yes On Tue, 23 May 2017 22:17:44 +0200, Michael Lemke wrote: > On Tue, 23 May 2017 22:04:52 +0200, Achim Gratz wrote: > >> Michael Lemke writes: >>> Now, how about an answer to my actual question? How do I get the Apache/php >>> dlls properly rebased? For reference, here's the error again and so is the attached >>> cygcheck.out. >> >> How large is your UserVM? You don't stand a snowflakes chance in hell >> with 2GB with your package selection and I suspect you'd run into the >> heap even with 3GB (I don't know if that's even possible to change on >> XP). You really need to reduce the number of packages you install if >> you insist on staying on 32bit. Most likely unrelated, but you also >> need to sanitize your PATH, at least get rid of all the duplicates, but >> better remove the WIndows stuff completely. > > Ok, starts to make some sense. Its a VM with 4GB configured with > whatever XP takes of that. I don't remember if I tought it the 3GB trick > and also don't recall how to do it. > > Anyway, the way I understand the problem is you have to distribute all > installed dlls such that they don't use the same memory region. This means > you can have only so many dlls installed. So is there some better way than > trial and error to see which dll is taking up the most space and if enough > dlls were uninstalled? Would rebase tell me aything? > Lacking further clues I did the trial and error thing and removed some stuff I thought I didn't need (like GNOME). Not sure yet what I broke but my Apache is working again. Thanks for the hint that the number of known dlls could be a problem. I'd still appreciate more precise information of how rebase works and if there is a more systematic approach. Michael -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple