X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:from:to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version
	:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=default; b=sqO
	80yK4H5CERezOpKZgiFJfEDQeGnzfmTgxd26pIHEkQ0/OcnOSt2wAM8Ub5TET7PI
	lU2TF0EU62ywbPSxdbjpAbcQ74+ndRl87mjNwFUihM0OsVafdEu9Pb0UKfShV3WV
	xWP7GbViEdgHgKvjNtZ2QqrHOxV/3OB44LDkpEVo=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:from:to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version
	:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=W5ElUQphS
	EYAYbUtlWoO3jHLyTQ=; b=L8LXE/H2cG5Kq5/mOoVBa1N5KHQ91J81p0RYjJnpP
	clOQEUtgX3TP+l8YRzHl9OU/tbfJYhHSksGUbsBFhqy2z1h9fLfqLt35xORWnNp6
	5//GDahWwFW8utml0kaNhjPW0Ic8p4tQaQySwaUJinap35zXn9kLct4+RGlcpoIS
	fo=
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-0.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KAM_ASCII_DIVIDERS,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=no version=3.3.2 spammy=communicate, Hx-languages-length:2801
X-HELO: mx02.jhcn.net
From: Chevallier Yves <YChevallier AT etel DOT ch>
To: "cygwin AT cygwin DOT com" <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject: Re: cygpath compatiblity break (v2.1 -> v2.7)
Date: Wed, 10 May 2017 11:30:53 +0000
Message-ID: <4fbaa9f1d22640179cff72187e7c70e8@de01ex22.GLOBAL.JHCN.NET>
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-gfi-smtp-submission: 1
x-gfi-smtp-hellodomain: de01ex22.GLOBAL.JHCN.NET
x-gfi-smtp-remoteip: 10.1.76.197
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id v4ABVIcG025310

I don't understand your points. See my reply below with the leading char $ 

This is the mail archive of the cygwin mailing list for the Cygwin project.
________________________________________
Index Nav:
[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:
[Date Prev] [Date Next]
[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:
[Raw text]

Re: cygpath compatiblity break (v2.1 -> v2.7)
. From: Marco Atzeri <marco dot atzeri at gmail dot com>
. To: cygwin at cygwin dot com
. Date: Wed, 10 May 2017 11:29:32 +0200
. Subject: Re: cygpath compatiblity break (v2.1 -> v2.7)
. Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
. References: <2ebc717eaaf041d7b516e93a6123b938 AT de01ex22 DOT GLOBAL DOT JHCN DOT NET> <2b3a4976-09b2-cece-759d-0b2379ae3a4d AT gmail DOT com> <edde67b3a1724bb484eb82cd48dcee67 AT de01ex22 DOT GLOBAL DOT JHCN DOT NET>
________________________________________
On 10/05/2017 11:12, Chevallier Yves wrote:
Unfortunately I haven't tried 2.8 because we've already validated 2.7 internally and I would need at least 3 months to access to 2.8.

That said I searched for a release note with information about cygpath, but I haven't find any.


Bottom Post in this mailing list. Please.
$ Is this a question? What do you please me for?

Cygpath is part of the cygwin package.
The source specific of "cygpath" is unchanged by ~ 6 months. The issue you see was likely a change inside the cygwin dll.
$ Yes it is exactly what I was arguing because even if I change `cygpath.exe` for the oldest version, the issue is still the same


About your internal validation, please note that the numbering scheme was changed with version 2.0
$ Which internal validation? Are you talking about `cygpath`?

https://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin-announce/2015-04/msg00046.html

I suggest you to consider 2.x version as the successor of 1.7.x.
$ I am considering 2.7 instead of 2.1 What are you talking about 1.7?

Regards
Marco

$ By the way I still don't know how to answer/reply a message from this mailing list. I have to do polling over https://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2017-05/ and copy/paste everything into a new e-mail. I doubt this is the correct way to communicate. Do you have a clue?



--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

________________________________________
. References:
o Re: cygpath compatiblity break (v2.1 -> v2.7)
. From: Chevallier Yves
o Re: cygpath compatiblity break (v2.1 -> v2.7)
. From: Marco Atzeri
o RE: cygpath compatiblity break (v2.1 -> v2.7)
. From: Chevallier Yves
Index Nav:
[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:
[Date Prev] [Date Next]
[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]



--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple