X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date
	:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=default; b=k3wPzkUDblxLHUds
	cQoBvK5tkpQMFOEkCxPJc5xVSIZv3ulZXJ94F3MTTM5YuS4V1Rxf4tqG3S3rUSpU
	8NVUe1IZRmhC38+9r4GWkXOMHllwDiP3mkT0KXhw7255SsmstBp5rbaH+gEisxEv
	8SalG8++sbNKj0dabCIfloeV/Q0=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date
	:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=6G2e7pmeIywSPeOCqBuyX2
	5ajiY=; b=MgBd+XFPSsFv3bKFFEXB0bmaPKkLEblTNLEeOCZdGpIcNApwsF8GIl
	peBWL5hyk3Nl3u7sPtGEqsQ8gHlwtAEAmkbkAJFqXWO0rskw6+Oolflk2Vrd5TtN
	ds28m6M79UyOUNO9OykcRSA8M6Bzw+D788Uj4tg9ttmVvBU+4gH3k=
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM,SPF_PASS autolearn=no version=3.3.2 spammy=H*i:sk:703af55, H*MI:sk:703af55, H*f:sk:703af55
X-HELO: mail-it0-f42.google.com
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;        d=1e100.net; s=20161025;        h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date         :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding;        bh=/Arl8Gl036Gtij95gLK5bsIGJR8NyLsDDhj6cVj0OAM=;        b=RKMs5iW/FsWhisHWqLm5MzsKNE9Ei6wFirKVgjBWclty10RfANSTD/c6vKG1ETknfv         Pww0NsRjec50u93bbE/zxS+IA9M6BVdsnBo7HRRVphnjESoE/FQnL+lJ8z0iRYu3OR1v         dvihDE4So9dMUOopKxlR28/qLSMd7vk//JsRNDpv8w7tkSDq6sEb10ApPSP2/M+/hXdn         Ni4QGUcd7SKHeoAswvFLw5ZGLP04qgPgmjvrw+RdBa8rv5VWb+o4AaMgHF7aws/NqCWZ         eS8xtjF7BO02Mp1PoxSk8ucYXU7k/P93X4XxnX/qmGvdxBkxnHZ51YOB9wRQRL0iSSyZ         qO0Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: AFeK/H1ConKRQaSAH3H1kGCPd7ZhwmQG2DtoNlyt6KLbYMAqRTZJL25/UD3bLrPA97eBhQ==
X-Received: by 10.36.216.4 with SMTP id b4mr33438916itg.100.1491572582926;        Fri, 07 Apr 2017 06:43:02 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Re: 64bit lapack-3.7.0-1.tar.xz - Empty
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References: <aefa5249-51e8-c320-7614-8354b8890da1 AT gmail DOT com> <7e8b44e4-78e9-f9a8-63c1-0979bcecbb87 AT gmail DOT com> <2b672a97-dc43-492f-48d0-c1fabdb7d56c AT gmail DOT com> <76251bb5-9303-6456-11b4-755032891880 AT gmail DOT com> <4e5dde61-633a-a8c1-d143-affb537f1e0c AT gmail DOT com> <159206dc-84d4-e34b-9be3-3d57d682b68e AT gmail DOT com> <9cda83a9-14b1-b997-4ee4-42cf1a602cce AT gmail DOT com> <2aa7094b-6fbc-c981-c20a-4270c1d173bd AT cygwin DOT com> <703af550-db59-326a-83bd-7407fb752612 AT dronecode DOT org DOT uk>
From: cyg Simple <cygsimple AT gmail DOT com>
Message-ID: <8b7f2478-ea15-04ab-e525-23cbaebba764@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 7 Apr 2017 09:43:01 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <703af550-db59-326a-83bd-7407fb752612@dronecode.org.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-IsSubscribed: yes

On 4/7/2017 7:44 AM, Jon Turney wrote:
> On 04/04/2017 18:19, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote:
>> On 2017-04-04 12:03, cyg Simple wrote:
>>> On 4/4/2017 9:04 AM, Marco Atzeri wrote:
>>>> On 04/04/2017 14:43, cyg Simple wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Exactly but the binary install of lapack should require
>>>>> liblapack-devel
>>>>> and liblapack0.
>>>>
>>>> I disagree. It will not happen for my packages
>>>
>>> What's the hardship that causes you to make such a bold statement?  You
>>> upload the same number of files, the only difference is telling setup
>>> that the package has dependencies.
>>
>> It's not a question of hardship, there is simply no need for it.
>>
>> Marco, you can simply remove lapack from PKG_NAMES in order to hide it
>> in setup.
> 
> It's on my TODO list for calm to perhaps have it discard binary packages
> which are 1/ empty and 2/ have no dependencies, to avoid this kind of
> confusion.
> 

Thanks Jon.  Indeed it is confusing to have these presented in setup.

> Historically, this has also caused problems where people have mistakenly
> specified this empty package as a dependency (e.g. written lapack where
> they should have written liblapack0)

Or searching using the setup search function and finding it to install
just to get nothing.

-- 
cyg Simple

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple