X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date
	:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=default; b=AVnKj7yFZzV33gmx
	G87EzYRXddjg73wI7rCaNLp7HUDPCRflx+S54Cbi6kREKARDRpoOab/ACqsI7iAf
	AC9qhUXPeM0X6tShYaqHB/K2k6giPfqiAUKvKi6YRwVHgBGc42RHwDpXvZPuo478
	Rsk+oNlFGKIx4aUsUEq1YXMTHZU=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date
	:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=4l3pkiJftw3ryIUKBPOUYv
	hUoeM=; b=yySp3zXfBIwjoj1LGzam3v/fOWg31baQKnjcAt/xfHTgIT2+fmw/lz
	pYC2V3PQ8wU4JXB+22ryBk7s6UAhrbDYmXqLnaU+s0GSLgjWfUv8ZNkZ+7JEmvKS
	Kh5FjpXEeIFciU3jbA0HONYooYFhrU2dP+Us1bZ5mvbX52WWBgBMo=
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=H*f:sk:7e8b44e, H*f:sk:2b672a9, H*i:sk:2b672a9, dependents
X-HELO: mail-pg0-f43.google.com
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;        d=1e100.net; s=20161025;        h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date         :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding;        bh=fDQsdVMRCY0RsIK/cy5e6gt2udc5cp6BnQy4lS+0XCM=;        b=DCEPCEeEaxfMv5TNUlsH+pElRJ2Mj8Jp0N0lfYMgJcUUMaRvoq6i+d0kwboVWSc8u3         uJu7qs4UlOAdu6XN0BRoi/nh8bleeUocLk0NoYaUP8C9xVMNGA51bjPmOSNjRKTcsyc7         f3Ei/KSFsji3R3e7OQN5qs4HxTMM2HLnBpSDWywuQOClRqsT093gn7EV1puJQeUSAknM         gg0mnLdLjYrzsttuVK608Ns33rDyURvRpdyg7e+mQs/zbrUUXzEDo30znutBO4+sz33T         FbnNPhcAKodZOBODUjlvA1/8inPvJboOBxLHJGfnHMCwTBRYNtRFGSYagqnM4J5WWgB4         MaxQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AFeK/H3OwzMbjb8D8aH7dQY/LD+/OdGZjlAGivrKzDZ3/3ADm+qT63CPFYsSntEIN4FdTQ==
X-Received: by 10.98.107.194 with SMTP id g185mr18415110pfc.22.1491234294594;        Mon, 03 Apr 2017 08:44:54 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Re: 64bit lapack-3.7.0-1.tar.xz - Empty
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References: <aefa5249-51e8-c320-7614-8354b8890da1 AT gmail DOT com> <7e8b44e4-78e9-f9a8-63c1-0979bcecbb87 AT gmail DOT com> <2b672a97-dc43-492f-48d0-c1fabdb7d56c AT gmail DOT com>
From: Marco Atzeri <marco DOT atzeri AT gmail DOT com>
Message-ID: <76251bb5-9303-6456-11b4-755032891880@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Apr 2017 17:44:47 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <2b672a97-dc43-492f-48d0-c1fabdb7d56c@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-IsSubscribed: yes

On 03/04/2017 17:07, cyg Simple wrote:
> On 4/3/2017 11:00 AM, Marco Atzeri wrote:
>> On 03/04/2017 16:53, cyg Simple wrote:
>>> The file is lapack-3.7.0-1.tar.xz 32 bytes with no contents.  I've tried
>>> two different mirrors.  There are also no dependencies applied.
>>>
>>> Reverting back to lapack-3.6.1-1.tar.xz proves that it is empty as well
>>> with the same no dependency rules.
>>>
>>
>>
>> source only. all the contents is in:
>>
>> $ cygcheck -cd |grep lapack
>> liblapack-devel                         3.7.0-1
>> liblapack-doc                           3.7.0-1
>> liblapack0                              3.7.0-1
>>
>
> Then these should be installed dependents of the chosen lapack.  Source
> only means nothing when you can choose the binary download.
>

there are today no packages depending from lapack.

I miss the relevance of your last comment; there are
~ 473 empty binary package in the distribution.

Please note that lapack is empty but the debug file for the three 
binaries is called lapack-debuginfo anyway as the upstream source file
is called lapack.

Regards
Marco





--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple