X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:reply-to
	:references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; q=dns; s=
	default; b=PfOFTAiegtScFKBmVrkvkqTCG7A9I7Ho/IaCsgMQ1FsHLeHE1r5TA
	6fyZlMwWMwfdLkTq2DErrpVAIJo9OBVPmUJ6IU4SWK0jni6+0Q4vQEMNYvX96pA/
	RpdtwT3IyZnRl09Z6eBM/Hm0DUMMZuQO7ScPfIPOKvdhMoMFavNi7s=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:reply-to
	:references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; s=default;
	 bh=oP/MDSwcqlyucOodDZTfbEaILG0=; b=wcE530KMCvEegnen/o2RHDyxds7f
	9/9EeWd3ZkZPK6TeNBWJbSac84j8kNr3cCShFmWsHZcXccq+2eQh86wIaUg44sMw
	wGt8SQ/sMHCoz/jAF0GUGz++QOEmYHJEgs2KCpBGpVYxOdye6SfNKbKTB9v4E6wP
	+O7WvTpMToZcErc=
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-106.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,GIT_PATCH_2,GOOD_FROM_CORINNA_CYGWIN,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=H*i:sk:3351956, H*MI:sk:3351956, H*f:sk:3351956
X-HELO: drew.franken.de
Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2017 09:30:50 +0100
From: Corinna Vinschen <corinna-cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: free() and implicit conversion to a function pointer
Message-ID: <20170317083050.GD16777@calimero.vinschen.de>
Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References: <c5af0608-17c4-2270-dbba-c3b704c9226e AT t-online DOT de> <f76885f4-f99f-dc50-2a19-cb892a62db7e AT t-online DOT de> <58CB07A8 DOT 9010401 AT tlinx DOT org> <33519566-7f9a-ad78-6160-ccfa6465c279 AT t-online DOT de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256;	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="J5MfuwkIyy7RmF4Q"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <33519566-7f9a-ad78-6160-ccfa6465c279@t-online.de>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.8.0 (2017-02-23)

--J5MfuwkIyy7RmF4Q
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Mar 17 00:49, Hans-Bernhard Br=C3=B6ker wrote:
> Am 16.03.2017 um 22:46 schrieb L A Walsh:
> > Going by subj and talk below, this is a bit confusing...
> >=20
> > But it looks like you are testing 'free' for a value?
>=20
> Not really.  The idea is to test free for _exixtence_.  Which only makes
> sense in case of weak symbol support getting involved.  In other situatio=
ns,
> there could not possibly be a need for a run-time if() test, because sure=
ly
> the code could know at build time whether free() exists or not.
>=20
> > Isn't standard 'free' declared to take 1 arg and
> > return void?
>=20
> Yes.  But since the code in question doesn't actually _call_ free, that's
> both irrelevant.
>=20
> > If you aren't talking standard 'free()', then
> > nevermind...
>=20
> We are talking standard free.  More to the point, we're discussing newlib,
> the package that actually implements free() for cygwin.
>=20
> > > The only code that might actually be a slight bit better than the giv=
en
> > >=20
> > >     if (! free)
> > >=20
> > > would be
> > >=20
> > >     if (0 !=3D free)
> > >=20
> > > The function designator `free' auto-decays into a function pointer,
> > > which is compared to a null pointer constant: 0.  The ! operator does
> > > that same thing implicitly, but is fully equivalent to it.
> > ---
> > Free autodecays to a function pointer?
>=20
> In the use case at hand: yes, it does.
>=20
> > In what language?
>=20
> Standard C.

Wasn't that supposed to go to the newlib list where this has been
discussed originally?


Corinna

--=20
Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Maintainer                 cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat

--J5MfuwkIyy7RmF4Q
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2
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=uzac
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--J5MfuwkIyy7RmF4Q--