X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:reply-to:subject:references:to:from:reply-to :message-id:date:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=default; b=azQyLVxQJOkXdJzi +blV1ZtLjeMe+tpahifRs3E4QlVHWwCN+6Wx2mMNs7bC4r06wgNfkVlRRJQXPIKG AFshHpMdN8P1iT755amNBkHD68jQRmXSgZ2aOeqpbyfpiVk89Hd49izYeflVstyK rm3wbZBkqcjfibyrtW8aocI6gBw= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:reply-to:subject:references:to:from:reply-to :message-id:date:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=0yxBPa3A+ue+nm5T2cBR5k eybhE=; b=S4jHbICRuL39CRbh8Lj6PPgUSlechLrSok27jxtBrwzaQaETo3KE32 tsNhCjLs29yOEhicLwcBFZpN/0o68hAeSwqFOF93pa0BHnpPU8lGEk6ka59BfBzf 6evQFCaN8whu5m4FJSFlHqzxwRq5SpgidA3G5j5alTiCSE3gNNYIo= Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=1.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_20,FREEMAIL_FROM,KAM_MXURI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_PASS autolearn=no version=3.3.2 spammy=disastrous, H*F:D*aol.com, H*UA:6.3, H*u:6.3 X-HELO: omr-a011e.mx.aol.com Reply-To: tprince AT computer DOT org Subject: Re: Strange errors running gcc tests on Cygwin References: <8fa02a72-e684-2ead-eacb-a5347d7594ae AT pobox DOT com> <82b31abc-7b7f-8f13-fc22-521c9ef84abf AT pobox DOT com> <8bda181f-f0bc-b0dc-2d2d-1bb17031ccee AT gmail DOT com> <583230d9-f45c-aaa0-ed77-5c50863406f5 AT gmail DOT com> <9b872914-d9cf-378e-6eec-96c175a61ffe AT pobox DOT com> <7372df4f-c55d-f9a3-325d-3f8800d67d98 AT pobox DOT com> <937197c6-f0cd-a7a0-a12f-d3f943ba2c1d AT SystematicSw DOT ab DOT ca> <53efff58-2f84-123a-95a4-a7c426c003ce AT SystematicSw DOT ab DOT ca> To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com From: "Tim Prince via cygwin" Reply-To: Tim Prince Message-ID: Date: Thu, 9 Mar 2017 18:57:18 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <53efff58-2f84-123a-95a4-a7c426c003ce@SystematicSw.ab.ca> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1b016258c1eccb505c X-AOL-IP: 72.49.129.109 On 3/9/2017 6:51 PM, Brian Inglis wrote: > On 2017-03-09 15:53, Daniel Santos wrote: > >>> If you are running a lot of Cygwin services, cron or Scheduled Tasks, >>> and/or background processes, you may want to look at running cygserver >>> to cache process info and common system info (including SAM/AD). >> I'm only running sshd -- no cron or "at" jobs (except whatever >> Windows installs by its self). However, gcc's make check spawns a LOT >> of processes. > Which was why I suggested it. Even on linux, I don't find it satisfactory to run make check without limiting processes to number of cores. On cygwin and wsl, make check seems to run into deadlocks or at least disastrous timeouts when running multiple processes. With a single process, cygwin runs it more reliably than wsl does. Conversely, sometimes (rarely) wsl can run make check-c and make check-fortran simultaneously. So it takes typically 2 full days to build and make check on cygwin. -- Tim Prince -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple