X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=default; b=tayowIoiIk6lBnVP jPbbUbkOtw50S9zvj1ludHwzTmiHRUFM9HloWcPMfsf3klkXHdiokn3GbRyga1xg PQUPlkfrEZ3QPTx9SmDyV8UK3YKs4DCdwoDyiR3nkkN3hbVd9FaewfmK1HYLCLDa +cVYb72lKs268FxRiKuCaIExv64= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=GhqzWhyywGEMBEOF1TVZBg yRipg=; b=U7mN1T88Mqq8e3X/iIPn7897s/8Uj4sMKxuIcpsEGNZpgjoCwOsKne 0i1pZWTWlDQgR0JvPW5K+9auMViVj8TFIuWTzw9xlyPmmuHzBvpV7+AlWezX35/W qSdtOFSgLxYnFd0EHDLJHMyhMWxV61uUsfgPe8XJVXvzJmDSTxr8o= Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=HCc:D*aol.com, luckily, H*i:sk:8bda181, H*f:sk:8bda181 X-HELO: sasl.smtp.pobox.com Subject: Re: Strange errors running gcc tests on Cygwin To: JonY <10walls AT gmail DOT com> References: <8fa02a72-e684-2ead-eacb-a5347d7594ae AT pobox DOT com> <82b31abc-7b7f-8f13-fc22-521c9ef84abf AT pobox DOT com> <8bda181f-f0bc-b0dc-2d2d-1bb17031ccee AT gmail DOT com> Cc: Tim Prince , cygwin AT cygwin DOT com From: Daniel Santos Message-ID: Date: Sat, 4 Mar 2017 22:24:07 -0600 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.5.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <8bda181f-f0bc-b0dc-2d2d-1bb17031ccee@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 009F6ECA-015B-11E7-B076-97B1B46B9B0B-06139138!pb-smtp1.pobox.com X-IsSubscribed: yes On 03/04/2017 09:46 PM, JonY wrote: > Cygwin does NOT use LD_LIBRARY_PATH, Cygwin uses PATH like all Windows > programs. It is one aspect that does not conform to *nix expectations. Wonderful, this simplifies it greatly! I was wondering why the dlls were under /usr/bin. :) Anyway, I'm waiting for the gcc bugzilla database to come back up and I'll file the bug. > Running tests under Cygwin is also complicated by the condition all DLLs > do not get rebased at runtime, or a fork() can fail. > >> This further implies that, if it is looking in the local environment for >> a library and not the build tree, then *all* test results could be >> invalid due to it using compilers and libraries locally installed rather >> than from the build tree, which would be very bad -- a regression that >> hides other regressions! >> >> As much as I just want to get my own tests done, I suppose I better >> debug this. *sigh* >> >> Daniel >> >> > I suppose you can try to run s/LD_LIBRARY_PATH/PATH/g to see how it goes. Well since I've gone this far I might as well come up with a patch for the problem as well. Luckily, I somehow made a mistake about the problem *not* happening on my first run of tests because I double checked and it did! I guess the compare_tests script isn't perfect. Also, I should make certain that this doesn't affect other tests (for instance, we need to be certain that we're loading the correct libgcc). Thanks for the help! Daniel -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple