X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:to:references:subject :content-type; q=dns; s=default; b=isL2U5wcfyqRT6BPsZgVpwwj/znQU Jup+rwBKjHpRorFcKGcRGYqrtIXpXncwP+IFU8yOqwPU2OPuhvb9UC//Wd6w3YYt xq0CYcRj/kDM5WXc7LMldMLwn1imPfTtJj4/nlgMveBDV/4ICLYBBjy6Pjws86iT EMrfrrAM5olyMc= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:to:references:subject :content-type; s=default; bh=nx+09o1KuKX0mJcSzZwb9yPuEgY=; b=nKN 7nqo7ObQv2SBBzTm7ubhk8b/GmFi0M6q0nLZxpOO7GC8neuIfxwZdiWo+IAiPl7H kK3XXul8ZUQATqpLKdq4S0Ey5en2bT7eO3G0FYNu+8Mus7uhANuSL8ZEclNVV4NR z/EIDFpyUAyBgwufmMpIPeOSdQze2cashTiJd410= Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM,SPF_PASS autolearn=no version=3.3.2 spammy=deference, H*M:google, research X-HELO: mail-oi0-f68.google.com X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:from:to:references:subject :user-agent; bh=nUg0U8ZojqB/yI6gh0ILf8P+PsSriHHNmZuoeYthwHc=; b=RsSDpuEfhLJyc3CTX5DhoBWOG7N7OQo5sHULuLC2kium33R693fhKJk2+CF08LOlZE EsB5APZajzVAiTuFTJQ4n92tfsmFJoRVb8OLn+YSy4PWlUdOMUpekB/ZgBBLcn5IePFx qYooiF5Y2FgVq83ItDj3Awe5XNp4jiyiaNfYRERqs+EL11ZoxoQm9JV/vd7zTr/3Blw2 PCrqsllIZ2v5f/OLnpmEPZZ+cfl7yo1WGLX729WGhIvP8EGQzex2zfudCYLkSF3lKDvW oiFbAhiVK7+OqEf4DvA2nNw5lpvSIu9hehIU8AsHqzWE0+j7WFc5CnbAcG97otGYedIg KvPA== X-Gm-Message-State: AMke39llvKaReC+QmYI+7kyQEM/zd9wP2K5tJ79Tq7tHMpAFnKvV4QVGCF8Ti9dCG1rI2g== X-Received: by 10.202.197.150 with SMTP id v144mr3776886oif.125.1487892779007; Thu, 23 Feb 2017 15:32:59 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <58af712a.920e9d0a.9e06e.c734@mx.google.com> Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2017 15:32:58 -0800 (PST) From: Steven Penny X-Google-Original-From: Steven Penny To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <1225366877 DOT 20170224005008 AT yandex DOT ru> Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: dash-0.5.9.1-1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf8; format=flowed User-Agent: Tryst/2.0.1 (github.com/svnpenn/tryst) On Fri, 24 Feb 2017 00:50:08, Andrey Repin wrote: > In fact, you should use specific shell name, if you want specific behavior. That is not at issue here. Both before and after this proposed change, I can use #!/bin/dash to explicitly call Dash and #!/bin/bash to explicitly call Bash. What _is_ at issue here is what is called with #!/bin/sh for _all_ users, not just myself or those whom have run your homebrewed script. In that regard, since we are giving deference to Debian by using their shell, I say we continue that pattern and use Dash as /bin/sh. > The big question remains, where this speed boost coming from? > Is this a startup time? Or some internal slowness? > Because in latter case, given your STC, this is a bash issue and should be > reported upstream. Dash is faster than Bash. This is not a question, it is a fact. It is not a _bug_ any more than a Ducati being faster than an 18-wheeler is a bug. Dash by design has less features than Bash _so_ that it can be faster than Dash. It would suit you well to do some research of your own on this topic before posting further. Cheers -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple