X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:from:to:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=default; b=C4qOub7LVAtjET+crjynS6St9or5gVvjT8eIzmyrJT9 Ak7ywFJ3unwYb+JMv/cT0K1Uam/vnEht83QS1x0HpFucmzN4XUloWP1DMOLw8nPd 9Vm2rqRM6M+uyt7Lp0MIGn3+Qo7EXqVsBt9oxeJvEj4zXiwbiuR+1hVlKvAmbB24 = DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:from:to:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=PyBF2iFK+K4ySTriaYGBwdY2EgY=; b=WMN4NNciSTlf6RyZR sL6p2bn6qG26tGgeFtes9eefGJ5+4fpwRn/yqMy2N1AzdfS3DJK4QUTbNlOywlid PI7yMr1orp43h1/RYNMOvvW4ObYmRlwU1DhkRhe4+nzJT+L7HhgsbcRoCLcdHnlm 0BCbpRcV2NQdhKnqtjTx2vVoFk= Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=occupation, H*f:sk:c03fd6f, bloda, BLODA X-HELO: mail-in-08.arcor-online.net X-DKIM: Sendmail DKIM Filter v2.8.2 mail-in-06.arcor-online.net 3vPzfh5FwRz8C1R From: Achim Gratz To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Apparent rebase issue References: Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2017 17:55:19 +0100 In-Reply-To: (Eliot Moss's message of "Thu, 16 Feb 2017 18:52:35 -0500") Message-ID: <87o9y0u58o.fsf@Rainer.invalid> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1.91 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id v1HGtmR1008808 Eliot Moss writes: > Today I tried to extend my emacs installation with emacs-X11 > and a few more packages. (I already had the non-X version of > emacs installed, and I have a well-working X setup running.) […] You may simply have run out of address space in your 32bit installation, although the collision seems to happen at a relatively high address, which might indicate BLODA. > C:\cygwin\bin\cygXt-6.dll: Loaded to different address: > parent(0x65E30000) != child(0x1C00000) > 2 [main] emacs-X11 7808 child_info_fork::abort: > C:\cygwin\bin\cygXt-6.dll: Loaded to different address: > parent(0x65E30000) != child(0x1B50000) What does /proc/7808/maps (replace 7808 with the pid of the process that trgiggers the messages) say about the occupation of the memory region in question? Regards, Achim. -- +<[Q+ Matrix-12 WAVE#46+305 Neuron microQkb Andromeda XTk Blofeld]>+ Wavetables for the Terratec KOMPLEXER: http://Synth.Stromeko.net/Downloads.html#KomplexerWaves -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple