X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:date:message-id:from:to:subject:references :in-reply-to; q=dns; s=default; b=XPeWTKvzMqLQqTHs4CsdUqTwctgcPu Tg+U1MhvQiYtHrQiPfvLfJNUthuwoU2sL9KmhTGOOjNXilruZ1SAYwOnPiaWuY8I tDo72Y+7TqptFcPfUthrsdSkOAUiAq9V9QZNSKSiereZQAiJEBTBW6PEy369leqr RvylyxaQp2ZOU= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:date:message-id:from:to:subject:references :in-reply-to; s=default; bh=jcuux8/AyJ9rxLK/Z5WsvFVJR+o=; b=rPiT F6HOxAU0BdGxjM8OpvXPx8xPlyDdXDlpLd7fWD6YZh2E82K1qXUtUzwRGnUJPiMl xBFzwlMVRJTh+UC9W8ZKe8aOdeTwU3i8Bvc+tL/Yuv0a3CnCDE0tncWNpRDV4gS9 CBQKO7XiHCCjx3Ow6VsrOfw1gAW7kkhUX4EZEpk= Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_20,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=Hx-languages-length:1467, Erik, H*F:D*nl, management X-HELO: lb1-smtp-cloud6.xs4all.net Date: Sat, 28 Jan 2017 14:44:13 +0100 Message-ID: <81b5af354b7a3925ff0a68dcc063265f@smtp-cloud6.xs4all.net> From: Houder To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: dash-0.5.8-3 References: <58893f48 DOT 0850ca0a DOT 6c5d DOT 5fde AT mx DOT google DOT com> In-Reply-to: <58893f48.0850ca0a.6c5d.5fde@mx.google.com> User-Agent: mua.awk 0.99 On Wed, 25 Jan 2017 16:14:00, Steven Penny wrote: > Obviously Bash is not the problem, nor readline as Dash doesnt use readline. So > it appears the issue this time is again with cygwin1.dll, or perhaps the Dash > package. .. uhm, it appears to me that Windows is the issue here. As those in the know do not feel inclined to respond, I will provide some guesses that are my own: - in terms of input buffer management, utf-8 encoded characters will not be recognized in case of bash and dash ... (they are under Fedora) - see the output of stty -a: iutf8 is not present (it is under Fedora) - readline provides bash with input buffer management for utf-8 encoded characters on Windows (that is why it 'works' in case of bash) - bash has support for utf-8 encoded characters ... (e.g. ls -l ? will include one-character filenames in case the name is made up of only one multi-byte character) - dash has no such support ... [1][2] Consequently, dash is only partly useful, even more so on Windows (as it would require an additional "helper" on Windows in order to obtain proper line-editing). Helper? readline, libedit ... However, I am only guessing ... (only Erik and Corinna can provide expert details here). Regards, Henri 1. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Almquist_shell see Debian Almquist Shell 2. http://www.mail-archive.com/dash AT vger DOT kernel DOT org/msg01072.html reply by Hertbert Xu, project owner of dash ===== -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple