X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date
	:message-id:subject:to:content-type; q=dns; s=default; b=lK+AxWi
	SqMsZVsvVoHrtwRKo8lqxSx9xzWK8MAGLXsKnaQRwlI9HoIOEFbmVPyLLnUbF8FY
	nJTyEI0/AWDohptLutm9RMRhy+7C0lSeT0M+VKAbic9rMaEUSEJL2nJT37h3UOY8
	8pQgRcoddDWFYfaDs+Lg8msKpt64/9t2aNS0=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date
	:message-id:subject:to:content-type; s=default; bh=S8fAB5Qty4Hc4
	UTps+rnZfmUo98=; b=mbu8ThFm/N8C4yQ72KVwa6DnLUYGmSUzMXTGfkFjVGN9r
	7p0SNuDKOX4ZdX8/8zd4nzpYbDHTLvZJJy8yH4oBOwA+k6dShwZsCu+18lLf+8Lp
	fVx5QHH1tYzp/froUdIowdtBkJf70/EgssrDY9ktcY9T5asQZcxOk6NM5bx1PI=
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=0.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=Sze, sze, U*swordangel, sk:swordan
X-HELO: mail-wm0-f45.google.com
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;        d=1e100.net; s=20161025;        h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date         :message-id:subject:to;        bh=4VDRpSC/Y9OGTYqrCdbtgNwB8aJ5OdBGGlR47a/eayo=;        b=CDG5lQG2EDX0M1Qs3Ts4qozbr38eI6glcvsplHMfs4+O4eo/+pSePOo7izoXXVW0bK         FUfSEUdHxy1Ly/PgveOIUvk/kv884VfqioDQ3eOiA6nm4AYUljae1gawsmtIr3rumwxv         zU/wO/MnJyJwNiPTsmhW7kZSOjrKH7uk8icJKqlUp81AvvkXbaYxKkigZpB2Tci7/ENL         HUrVi48nQc8vzjvaru/JjHX30P5lqLyuqg3rOYBfQSCesrynpD4ZvsB9f+W/ZOsofWAE         dBmGwaAoV4vq4Q8nVStCG67Slb2j1K7PWS75epiPgand4gAfAnM3Q/rLQL7WxzWC/zWI         NM3Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXLsPySPzkhaeYMUxG2JwMXgyKZmY0nnODfCooJgcD5t8cohbPznCGAQFlPC7l6sgGLd2V12nfAGI57Dyw==
X-Received: by 10.28.23.16 with SMTP id 16mr590149wmx.134.1481796675954; Thu, 15 Dec 2016 02:11:15 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAGZiy71hduc-LZvLvqXWNzYpN7foKrvobVP5q3S=KeagukQAsg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAGZiy71hduc-LZvLvqXWNzYpN7foKrvobVP5q3S=KeagukQAsg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
From: Ismail Donmez <ismail AT i10z DOT com>
Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2016 11:10:45 +0100
Message-ID: <CAFo71_4-TzfjbDK_JdOya7c-Nhtv9DfuFtgSaT2AEf=FDShpvw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Latest setup.exe not code-signed?
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-IsSubscribed: yes

Hello,

On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 2:58 AM, Kal Sze <swordangel AT gmail DOT com> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> It looks like the new setup-x86_64.exe is not code-signed? Is that on
> purpose? IIRC, the previous versions were code-signed. Do we now only
> rely on the .sig signature file to verify it?

It was never code signed and the reasons for this has been discussed
before. You can search the list for the reasons.

Regards,
ismail

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple