X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date
	:message-id:subject:to:content-type; q=dns; s=default; b=g3urJYN
	FSZTVpVDNnJ2+L9F0gOFHu99H83bxe54IAyeKqyv9YVpnJ6z52bkudyLDbyIYsAY
	fO/U2yrdsutpiMRFhpHKadq1Q5nwN851C8aYrZrtXnxggCFB6q87fEne5NU41R2x
	0oFtor4H0F4bv0d+tV5Y8dTvcyblf8PAfdo4=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date
	:message-id:subject:to:content-type; s=default; bh=iTB0eYK9yzyvn
	nYg5wd19z6VJhc=; b=FOMnz4lUYrGS4alMmMJpDlrg5PSq9j59dccbPaChg5KIB
	gMszAtVKkKI3/10dqDVf0e0VAUM1XdkDtjl6R1g3TY6l5/O4VNy40W5g1UZIVyQN
	4xfNjU5E0D3pVf+CE5kMC+1AQtSiLaol30yZMXYwPzCJMdVkJ6Z5ralKKR/2NQ=
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=H*MI:sk:CACoZoo, reasoning, downloading
X-HELO: mail-wm0-f51.google.com
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;        d=1e100.net; s=20161025;        h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from         :date:message-id:subject:to;        bh=ECpWQU8TP9m7aYyiZnjSBGFMIsP1QRS/e+VIbTayQeE=;        b=KtWAef9JZ+DBgHupepFtzWt6X7RXO6ZmJ5Kdc8frC00pRPIBQKrXpK94yfZmzOMHII         VzKqkFQ2UcRDGc3TBiZwkiqiDON7j6J/zRbjK4Oqk3R57QiJUCancVlYWK8jHbw5tHns         WvXz93bkcB0OrmXwY5utb3dB05DDFRjRFuR2EAQiq4dWfhp5qgdMZqWoVW4TH3WAAJ2W         kz7XzgI0XF8/ZkSzAZTv91zmKM58pl8RN4/KK4BsHPuL+bkdPp1HE33FujYD+YRMcJzS         5uBjlxA9JCixES35t+eZVeUV1o31SN0m7bKOSPmrmlF3D45A9ZJzIm+ycjG+qZ7OseSK         mvMA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AKaTC036pLDb1Ctpox0L7uVwFef/QtwLIYj+wJPeoq7hsUHZfN20HUVVgBVPkprtDG4XLElWEXRrjMG6BlpxFQ==
X-Received: by 10.25.165.144 with SMTP id o138mr11786581lfe.172.1481752716352; Wed, 14 Dec 2016 13:58:36 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <044562e5-6c8e-1649-0a48-0e486a098510@gmail.com>
References: <CAG-pUxkQ_iniFA0r9i2zkT1uFMEvCei0wc9rd45RBYj2uBnVhA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <d7f8f9e5-e77d-8dde-8882-15084904cbe0 AT mitel DOT com> <CACoZoo0zFt++CnsXjvvG1rrAd3fdv2mBd9=pZiRcd6+1VDC3Eg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <9d6c50f4-3759-0a45-a97c-30b031a906a0 AT SystematicSw DOT ab DOT ca> <CACoZoo3QQb751UVGiQSo1ArskXOpJR=xhn=zFPJwSreW7FYefA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <1cdcdc17-200d-6ec1-66c5-894c0cf16937 AT gmail DOT com> <CACoZoo09=r6GS5q2uWUfooDH8s=NzoD1dhyK=JTY2XaCiYKCAA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <044562e5-6c8e-1649-0a48-0e486a098510 AT gmail DOT com>
From: Erik Soderquist <ErikSoderquist AT gmail DOT com>
Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2016 16:58:35 -0500
Message-ID: <CACoZoo3bafxrYNQn9_DpqEu7aqEomxZo+M-5sZ7Q8=UGCfAGhw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Installer names not meaningful enough
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-IsSubscribed: yes

On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 4:50 PM, cyg Simple <cygsimple AT gmail DOT com> wrote:
> And if we were purely *nix your argument might hold merit but this setup
> executable provides a Windows OS based install of a Windows based
> application set known as Cygwin.

If we were purely *nix, we wouldn't be on Windows in the first place.

> The name of the executable has never been a problem; why are you trying
> to create one?  There are just as many that would keep it simple and
> leave the name as is.

I don't recall anyone trying to create a problem so much as find out
the reasoning behind the decision and ask for the setup executable
version information to be more accessible than it currently is.  At
present, it does not appear that the cygwin pages list the current
setup executable version at all, forcing either an aborted setup run
when the setup executable itself reports that the setup.ini file
indicates the currently running executable is outdated, or downloading
*something* to see if the version of setup available for download has
changed.

-- Erik

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple