X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date
	:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=default; b=K95M7d0LT0FBJVWj
	Y9MhigENILqSZdT9A8WSLvvmOfLJp0KicdFABK5y8G07YvWoraBsr2mNqtb3C+sP
	IlmTo/JK2eC+I8mcQRnpXXy4lW09WfnVGXyMj8ZQibFHs9XmNJIzigGL1Ai0h1/M
	FEWaqrJvOMJOa9ImHEFWJ+2P4vA=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date
	:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=SmNatlBckUsx7azUXYduOt
	TyUEs=; b=m+H1OP4qGWydK1z7TF2KL/QShaO/IzkpcDH4zKyf15n5mbsBhZeUe6
	ZdXj/uoj8lmi23mHvWr6N+wTkib4jnOopFZDFtIly3yZfHT7xexatbQYXB/JfgDd
	f+1qu33xCW+yo0m/Rp0D21inUoULBuIvhTBeJkNshKxtmxb3blsUc=
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=retroactive, 46AM, 46am, Hx-languages-length:1680
X-HELO: mail-it0-f49.google.com
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;        d=1e100.net; s=20161025;        h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date         :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding;        bh=XOToIkZEdlgNY1u6M6gUKB6wxRTg9Nv5byGsO36wuxE=;        b=l7g+kXQ2d1vBPjosFbyVvPe0/MoWy17/JU85Alh0FlwQ9S8yp4rrZNVeutudKfM2mv         50SDduB7IC0NZFN1OuTQJCTsM54DlYXJSLR5/o+qf12IJwxYh84xBkDaHy+kTE3G6mQe         SywitBfCgV6L47AZwrmMbzauG7w1A7pcPZhHT0ay1N8KyP+WvLuy3Jv3v8O+Sf8/F629         7saqRngbuSXxgecIFJ7GtSNziFoi45ml4++5fUmj7nyy40yrMGC89bWMEpuAhEfN1reJ         PtDw+4n3tLRZGB1WfxCPy6D6u7Ev3qpXGltKFTB3ePFeXPqnA5WKlOAeIj7YsEAXP078         WbZA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AKaTC02MnDygDJoebKV9B1omVe9EFXFh9jFaIjwG5hBIaFzQaWssgNHFUzeFsOZdKkUukA==
X-Received: by 10.36.211.137 with SMTP id n131mr9632850itg.28.1481751633722;        Wed, 14 Dec 2016 13:40:33 -0800 (PST)
Subject: Re: Fwd: Re: DMARC - gmail.com or is it yahoo.com
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References: <CACoZoo29vXpb0MzUri+NPJiZ5GSF+VZAykLa+JjS=g0VDEP7Pg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <6d23d97b-98b3-f501-9992-b0e3b6b0d263 AT gmail DOT com> <20161130155549 DOT GA29847 AT redhat DOT com> <20161130160012 DOT GA7318 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <20161210203947 DOT GA434 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <472618a5-9cab-5573-f77e-0e3177557732 AT gmail DOT com> <20161214152804 DOT GA2077 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx>
From: cyg Simple <cygsimple AT gmail DOT com>
Message-ID: <1449a24c-5f59-dc17-59da-f741140cf562@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2016 16:40:25 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.5.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20161214152804.GA2077@ednor.casa.cgf.cx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-IsSubscribed: yes

On 12/14/2016 10:28 AM, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 09:15:46AM -0500, cyg Simple wrote:
>> On 12/10/2016 3:39 PM, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>>> On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 11:00:12AM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>>>> On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 10:55:49AM -0500, Frank Ch. Eigler wrote:
>>>>> cygsimple wrote:
>>>>>> See the description below of a problem that is occurring because of
>>>>>> DMARC rules in place by yahoo.com.  Is there anything you can do for this?
>>>>>
>>>>> cgf, any chance of updating our copy of ezmlm-toaster etc.?
>>>>> Newer-than-2014 versions of ezmlm-idx seem to have some DMARC
>>>>> capabilities.
>>>>
>>>> I started looking at this when it came in.  No ETA yet.
>>>
>>> Huh.  I thought I sent an update about this but it vanished in the aether.
>>>
>>> I just turned on a new DMARC-aware version of ezmlm-send which rewrites
>>> the From address for any domain that is DMARC sensitive to something like:
>>>
>>> "User name via mailinglist <mailinglist AT sourceware DOT org>"
>>>
>>> when the mail is broadcast to the mailing list.  I would have done this
>>> sooner but my ezmlm skills were really rusty and I almost ran out of
>>> extremities to shoot.
>>>
>>> Please send any errors or issues encountered to overseers AT sourceware DOT org.
>>
>> The issue continues.
>>
>> Here are the message numbers:
>>
>>   206020
>>   206062
> 
> I sent the above on 12/10.  Those messages were sent on 12/1 and 12/7
> respectively.  The change was not retroactive.

But I only received the reject notice today. Yes, I understand the delay
mechanism across multiple systems.  Thanks for checking.

-- 
cyg Simple

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple