X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=default; b=P307vvzN8pKrVwrb jce15uMMqcaLR8xgC7l2US9DE0O0uUmnslEZ14T8LJsktCSYcCjKeccSzMw+66pm WTTL+xFKKCYD3As/Ty0au3RAcvdzL2bUIc7F2NwoJ3tsnAgrOgMkh6CCt+dzgoIJ BrAecXvkZRpAtFUR7DZAiBa9nFM= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=0ongUoCiYelny2+xwaaqIF BncAI=; b=Ar0pPzhZJ/tce5W8hD6oWxFa4P5TX3i7hSMgkmG+5S0MqN0mT82IMy WgISccpfzJArjJXH4ihfIAJPqkNZkRFPv+ItcJFrEI2Pkz/ALepQ4rhhmJbh7GtG sRzJ8LJDM/jpWxCdfpNev14bjB902GDTcZe4SeW2gcw/KMi1tQDPw= Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=Things, Eliot, H*MI:sk:ba495ad, H*f:sk:ba495ad X-HELO: mail-wj0-f182.google.com X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:subject:to:references:from:message-id :disposition-notification-to:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=SwgepzYBAEi2xTkH5/Njob+5VLBLbJDoDkKjM+P7foM=; b=CumVrVYOOaitpwHh2lo2NQdGbcSv894bW/CnLjXW/2O8+z/TkQWb5EzN+yATM/sda/ yyZw8Pbu4GVK0BkbMp2OmkaHA0vaqq5QkEID64xwLawdJ0CnSU7Wx2fXW4cw6VPtTPuu O5IUTV+UPc4eBlXR8EeRo8IcB9WcMqoBwPYj82HwYOWnOnWq1g5neWcYxTx3EqrAmdrr VfEm/uq4dmXMtKEzTVSbjr2LdLmhTy49Xnu6hPSI+HwRMMdz24YbvhnDiLU8SA9Pyyns rPY/qYmUgSUEmqMgppV2WCkofgKcB3k/zwpf/+WTTNEDntYIpHQLWISflRcJsKucGlS9 Ybjw== X-Gm-Message-State: AKaTC02AmKRdOAyZFcNOhpEU+3XUwDiALwo/wXOEuMynGMA8eYenf+VVVp6E/xKXKW2Y+w== X-Received: by 10.194.173.73 with SMTP id bi9mr33116083wjc.120.1480598753318; Thu, 01 Dec 2016 05:25:53 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: Installer names not meaningful enough To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: From: Vlado Message-ID: <93ce058d-79e6-a213-1b6f-1ec3438b71c4@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2016 14:25:49 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.5.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes On 1.12.2016 13:51, Eliot Moss wrote: > I think that including the version of the setup program could be helpful > - I tend > to add it (renaming the file by hand). However, clearly we've lived > with things this > way for a long time ... I disagree. I have a script to update Cygwin. This script checks for new version of setup, downloads, verifies signature, etc. Things would become much more complicated with variable setup file name. Finally: Why should I care about the exact version number of setup? Script makes backups of the old setup files like setup.exe.0001, 0002, ..., just for a cause, but never in the past I did have to looking for the setup with exact version number. Vlado -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple