X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=default; b=w2Agg0NITlVm0mMj cOX3pnJNNNkTg8n/Hz8zWY1Mf/hbRqkl1Fx3YQ0vjCcM8/HKOreDEte29K8n2vXV TN/CiyTDwe6t03tky1J+zva1f/ufxbPM2asJcC9DKUUZRCmknKGGySzeehFAs7yu blBw6ITTlQNJCoJJz+6VMaV8BGE= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=to/9VUOiF5d7veZKReOg4f /cCAA=; b=aE9pfrZyqWHLi7MIAkY9gnbcQx74RhUcuPj45tPoS42veqnpsjpGPC J2cbaWNiY+MuQBffZQ7+plouprMJbRjkvp+3FQaA7P6m4i63gJORyv8yqBhHpcRK 095NGxLypdFDgPbeCzPTp9GrSgq6GScO5NFL/ZHSgYXu5zjELx1K4= Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=Hx-languages-length:1500 X-HELO: mail-it0-f43.google.com X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=RJTE1CBOw6oqt2+QxeYiaw3Cb4yChonTa0nhGWt1ijc=; b=U46mKpUM7S/IMZ+9UNSwK4FFYjNWWZ6YHKRA8VTjDTZddrfsTdXgmfxsXvPA/axEZu nYuw/qUm052aKaY98h1j06ywgQR1GiVaOEGW18o68oquw4Qx8cYurwYpw5K2Ydn/EWyu 5iGaeQ1AZGNEuhGep2a7a2Wqu8TOQt18dExtk+i29q8CAOnSrr4EcJ6lUFs0LoWJ36iL ZPSzCiAnNjHRI1zfZSLj0Qf0v8u8vS3qxmKWfWA6mVAe/8ipDN1fb0tQDQNmWEwKMvbR QK0g065AZXxKPOXSy9hsgkzTwHK67m8LnrqmZ3cZw32GQkRt6dCIf008dBaq2dhIaatW 0XAg== X-Gm-Message-State: ABUngvedIZJ98Term83OQaJdnzxyejzeJRgQxXuAPBEK4B11WIYZ6mBv8UQzIW2UFfHAoA== X-Received: by 10.36.69.155 with SMTP id c27mr20061691itd.1.1478840481129; Thu, 10 Nov 2016 21:01:21 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: issetugid - not declared when _XOPEN_SOURCE is also defined To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <9bb90c12-b50b-faf9-b309-f916dd84bebe AT gmail DOT com> <20161110091010 DOT GB6075 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> From: cyg Simple Message-ID: Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2016 00:01:12 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20161110091010.GB6075@calimero.vinschen.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-IsSubscribed: yes On 11/10/2016 4:10 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > On Nov 9 14:41, cyg Simple wrote: >> On 11/9/2016 1:13 PM, cyg Simple wrote: >>> The following program demonstrates the issue. Should issetugid be >>> declared with this scenario? >>> >>> /*****************************************************/ >>> #define _XOPEN_SOURCE 1 /* Causes declare warning */ >>> #define __BSD_VISIBLE 1 >>> #include >>> >>> int main(int argc, char ** argv) { >>> int result; >>> result = issetugid(); >>> } >>> /****************************************************/ >>> >> >> Because when _XOPEN_SOURCE is 1 _DEFAULT_SOURCE doesn't get set which >> then #undef __BSD_VISIBLE and and sets it to 0. See >> /usr/include/sys/features.h. >> >> If I #define _DEFAULT_SOURCE 1 before the #include then the above code >> works. However, should it? > > Yes. You have a bug in your code. Never (and I mean *never*) use the > __foo_VISIBLE macros in your code. Please read the long comment > preceeding the visibility macro handling in /usr/include/sys/features.h. > You want to use either _DEFAULT_SOURCE or _BSD_SOURCE (deprecated but > probably available for another 100 years). > > Also, note the description of the __foo_VISIBLE macros later in the file. > It introduces the macros as "private" macros. Yea, I figured that out. I used __BSD_VISIBLE after looking at the header for the function. Thanks for your time; sorry for wasting it. -- cyg Simple -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple