X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:subject:references:to:from:reply-to:message-id :date:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=default; b=Aoj1PVWt92c2ig99 4JNXfGqWyT0V+d0LKqHIzIHgS5ucih7ENYfLbMGN252JhCWX/cyDw6z9iAWsGnyt zIPSE5azBl4DUdYLUKO02riHCCGhveYScsEIv3p/7pkycTBN0rS/+u29Ew6s7iXH BR8hycLMiq+r6CF559CBu7r3ZAc= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:subject:references:to:from:reply-to:message-id :date:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=YvaMmzyK43nwGaKyPOZSrl XaorI=; b=OdOlyHuPQHj8j7AkXwDzzS0lXp0zuhoVFXpNVfzLhd6AYvp88zLVQa 99N9mfT0KdPj3RPKX4CK2DXagQexBwrJongcBJm7420MZe8139fL/lxy5nu1N8pC aJHOPyG1fnPDFJ8yQlXPmWYa3zSLrw6gM4t7SBoVtqo6bBDZCpaSg= Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=0.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_40,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=no version=3.3.2 spammy=iot, Surface, Hx-spam-relays-external:64.59.136.139, H*RU:64.59.136.139 X-HELO: smtp-out-so.shaw.ca X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.2 cv=SPoybKnH c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=WqCeCkldcEjBO3QZneQsCg==:117 a=WqCeCkldcEjBO3QZneQsCg==:17 a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10 a=w_pzkKWiAAAA:8 a=mDV3o1hIAAAA:8 a=w5aJ8kaLLAry8Qfnm_kA:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 a=9_CB3tsf_QYA:10 a=RLeWZs9yk0EA:10 a=sRI3_1zDfAgwuvI8zelB:22 a=_FVE-zBwftR9WsbkzFJk:22 Subject: Re: sys/cdefs.h or maybe gcc build issue References: <57cbf5e2-f37b-ae50-f65c-dd6782481962 AT gmail DOT com> To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com From: Brian Inglis Reply-To: Brian DOT Inglis AT SystematicSw DOT ab DOT ca Message-ID: Date: Sun, 30 Oct 2016 15:09:23 -0600 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <57cbf5e2-f37b-ae50-f65c-dd6782481962@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-CMAE-Envelope: MS4wfGilpOu/XYjUzV0PnDRyxPA99j1PpGyL07E07V0Ah4m9ef98tkXxpi6b/82hYkNC0gjFZejLVPQedaFTysbomnwsNBhsEYuNFnm3D6/JB/tlVQ62+wvF Ceu0Ur+9RxSMcZd+aRC/Czkbo8YHeH67brFU2RuJpydgYN7gm2USWJ8KsR6e6+0YJm5m4beY9AYV0A== X-IsSubscribed: yes On 2016-10-30 12:23, cyg Simple wrote: > The below sample code will give a warning that visibility isn't > supported in this configuration. Either the GCC build is incorrect or > the sys/cdefs.h needs to be modified to define __hidden to empty. https://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2005-08/msg01057.html gcc wiki demonstrates what needs to be done instead: https://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/Visibility#line-76 at a minimum add `&& !define(__CYGWIN__)`; other posts also exclude MinGW and ARM-PE (W10 Surface, IoT) targets using PE format not ELF; gcc notes not all ELF targets support this: https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-3.3.5/gcc/Function-Attributes.html#index-_0040code_007bvisibility_007d-attribute-1624 Which raises the interesting question - anyone tried porting Cygwin to non-x86 arch? -- Take care. Thanks, Brian Inglis, Calgary, Alberta, Canada -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple