X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=default; b=hkJegEEK7DtObeRE +kHjuhq2YgyPjuq5+rI1eeUl4LS9+vGxMKvFbs4BC8tSujPaLzbQ94pyBxpGFHSd N+XpJxAQk+JVnOvZdQ21YLSdQHaVDzOLslF/Vw36jEzce5UVXu+Aglmks6jNfdV0 5A83hAOFXBspWNxQ8u+vCKQWkQo= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=59nHI17jio1zCgaRZk4i2r BPIRQ=; b=OQTbj3qnvp2m8m9Ez+zeK/mioEjlnle2sB1h5mDq9tO97PScCVXouz SY+c/+qfxdb3hd5UGOxOWEWLIq72ebkpJAkMDuj3E0OAZRfg5cACxWYU+Yvu3FNv DIDV1TAcV/dxMLYNCKQ+rJyasUtjjsCT5CiBECBpt79qJBk9/OjaM= Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=sutcliffe, Sutcliffe, vim, reinstall X-HELO: mailout02.t-online.de Subject: Re: Blocking a base package from installing To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: From: =?UTF-8?Q?Hans-Bernhard_Br=c3=b6ker?= Message-ID: <3e621a89-f4e3-ee04-f7a1-4fd7312a1a18@t-online.de> Date: Thu, 6 Oct 2016 19:14:38 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Am 06.10.2016 um 16:57 schrieb Chris Sutcliffe: > I'm using a self compiled vim, so I uninstalled vim-minimal. Every > time I run setup to get the latest updates, setup attempts to > reinstall vim-minimal - is there a way to make setup ignore > vim-minimal? With the alternative being to pick a fight with the tools, wouldn't it be a whole lot more straightforward to install your own vim with --prefix $HOME or /usr/local instead? That's what I do with basically all packages I install from sources; and using stow to manage them even makes that reasonably painless. -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple