X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:reply-to:subject:references:to:from:message-id :date:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=default; b=N9lKk8SPHQwXDq4s 4biSOKXViJzhW/+ojNBuPf4+0wy9x5vWpaYBpzGvcnYw5aU+copgPWuZxEzu9chb gXgWJW5Bur77g3fwvDLSdGDkuPD+zTwibQIAnbXRrCqG88qciVvrhaokj2yKylVW P07TpgXvcsI10BzayOJEl+8nNNA= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:reply-to:subject:references:to:from:message-id :date:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=RpSpJYjqXcvHY6wXIwwqju XMtW8=; b=qKGjZLvmmM0AF4E/DlP2jIS3tS/t0dtEE6XO+rCENS8Vz/GIjn51CX dQnj6GWEMykqv2zDvtSsnUYq0ENv1dEwGAV7TkC9J1Ibth3psJQ9+4igG0scpl7G H2XMk7POiMVzXfRbDXKz9gbFPTN2U1S16SFBd2TZXms5wxcUcW1vc= Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=H*i:sk:19afd29, H*f:sk:19afd29, H*MI:sk:19afd29, research X-HELO: mailsrv.cs.umass.edu Reply-To: moss AT cs DOT umass DOT edu Subject: Re: Problem with Python programs with binary components, who to blame? References: <156f59f4272 DOT c6a11ec33673 DOT 3924353846235894325 AT zoho DOT com> <19afd29b-3fbb-922f-9b05-e394475f1876 AT gmail DOT com> To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com From: Eliot Moss Message-ID: Date: Sun, 4 Sep 2016 15:43:50 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <19afd29b-3fbb-922f-9b05-e394475f1876@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-IsSubscribed: yes On 9/4/2016 10:43 AM, Marco Atzeri wrote: > On 04/09/2016 16:34, Patrick Pief wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Before writing any formal bug report I thought I might ask first whether the >> problem I am seeing is something that can be even fixed from Cygwin's side. >> >> The issue has to do with the compilation of Python binary packages for Python >> inside Cygwin (Python installed as a Cygwin package as opposed to Python for >> Windows). >> The problem starts to show as gcc warnings: "[…] redeclared without dllimport >> attribute: previous dllimport ignored", and ends with linkers errors such as: >> "relocation truncated to fit [...] against undefined symbol". >> >> I am guessing the problem might actually lie within the Python sources itself >> but I am not entirely sure. >> >> So is this some issue that is even worth further research and filing a bug >> report here? > > > On windows all symbols must be available at linking time. > Cygwin programs/libraries have the same constrain. > > Can you report the full command that produce : > ""relocation truncated to fit [...] against undefined symbol"." ? > > Are you building a specific program or it is your own development ? I also wonder about: - 32-bit versus 64-bit Cygwin, whether it may be an issue - Such a build would need to be treated as a Posix build, not a Windows build, and probably should not be trying to access Windows libraries (as opposed to Cygwin libraries) dllimport is meaningful for Windows, not for Posix, I believe. So I wonder if you're actually running Cygwin's gcc ... Anyway, some things to check into ... Eliot Moss -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple