X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:reply-to
	:references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; q=dns; s=
	default; b=IdERnW+But8fe2oFMpliRj0Pv+wHgogvmQ61z6PEABb4glHrZbudl
	552hTZay3R7C31HW1pG8GDTbTxffJE0ANo4x3ztZMwPsphjuquCeAUF7VcmGR1Jd
	7sE9VNIwQIJGDBZkFZ9uRxhFlRRSR+a9qPiA7RmgZk25iCaBek2ht4=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:reply-to
	:references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; s=default;
	 bh=ba8yVAxWKK9OjnAHquGWbRsHTIU=; b=vA+9sbW2YBS5Sy+iekiyYAuFt0R0
	KoM15x5fjcO0aqdC03cQd5vQzkUWpcKIgZetgJHsJF4+BaQSlo9Ulf9XSL2WrSVZ
	xqWh8DwbKdJw/RMBDeL+e3O5P1/LtuLne+dYzQRPwZzYtptscOyefPugQ8JYE5qG
	UU9gjMe0JTRrSNE=
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-101.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,GOOD_FROM_CORINNA_CYGWIN,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=experimentation, inconsistency, era, cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-HELO: drew.franken.de
Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2016 16:30:01 +0200
From: Corinna Vinschen <corinna-cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: Different representations of time in ls -l and date(1)
Message-ID: <20160831143001.GA22389@calimero.vinschen.de>
Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References: <A45B1767F1002449A37508C2CC6003D736A332 AT DEFTHW99EJ1MSX DOT ww902 DOT siemens DOT net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256;	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="8t9RHnE3ZwKMSgU+"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <A45B1767F1002449A37508C2CC6003D736A332@DEFTHW99EJ1MSX.ww902.siemens.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.6.2 (2016-07-01)

--8t9RHnE3ZwKMSgU+
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Aug 31 14:23, Schwarz, Konrad wrote:
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Schwarz, Konrad (CT RDA ITP SES-DE)
> > Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2016 2:51 PM
> > To: 'cygwin AT cygwin DOT com'
> > Subject: RE: Different representations of time in ls -l and date(1)
> >=20
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Schwarz, Konrad (CT RDA ITP SES-DE)
> > > Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2016 1:42 PM
> > > To: 'cygwin AT cygwin DOT com'
> > > Subject: RE: Different representations of time in ls -l and date(1)
> > >
> > > Sorry for the previous incomplete mail.
> > >
> > > So my problem is that date(1) outputs AM/PM style dates, whereas ls -
> > l
> > > uses 24 hour times.
> > >
> > > $ ls -l rtos_benchmark.lst
> > > -rwxr-xr-x+ 1 mchn1350 Domain Users 263 Aug 31 13:14
> > > rtos_benchmark.lst*
> > > $ date
> > > Wed, Aug 31, 2016  1:39:35 PM
> > > $ echo $LC_TIME
> > >
> > > $ echo $LANG
> > > en_US.UTF-8
> > >
> > > Shouldn't they be using the same format?
> >=20
> > Further experimentation shows that they
> > do indeed use the same format in the POSIX locale, (LANG=3DC), as
> > required by that standard.
> >=20
> > However, I still think it is an ugly inconsistency for them to differ
> > in the en_US.UTF-8 locale (which I assume is the default locale in
> > Cygwin).
>=20
> Still further investigation shows that on SUSE Linux, with LANG=3Den_US.U=
TF-8,
> both of these utilities consistently, if counter-intuitively, display 24 =
hour time.
>=20
> So I think the problem lies in Cygwin's locale database.

If so, it would be Window's locale database.  Apart from information
not available on Windows (era and messages info) all other locale
info is fetched from Windows.


Corinna

--=20
Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Maintainer                 cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat

--8t9RHnE3ZwKMSgU+
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2
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=q92i
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--8t9RHnE3ZwKMSgU+--