X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:date:from:reply-to:to:message-id:subject :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; q=dns; s=default; b=Nbi1+FdNzmNoIpKZfLrd5SzNu3hu2bX7Bj56dlXRlr6 ubP56XQNkxeLBXStKDAYcBUzkA7eGG1Icj5DqY4f8W9tB1d6DjruLoUE59CxEaM6 4O7hld1Gyc87O0ZqxqyedhitZkMM4pw/s3aEDzz37e92W5V9nMPKPygnaxo3zDb4 = DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:date:from:reply-to:to:message-id:subject :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; s=default; bh=m9PK6a8YvwIjJcNchQLzdPgLkPU=; b=vIakyALtPXsvz1dlH 80Ydco8i0WTkHhqdznenDh+FPZkfgUeWgzp0QF6gjbLdUMFupJjmOPKKH8v2N6Ax gkwArvMMd+oo1Zhbp7QePo+MYHEndFb6JwA488EFqcNeIh8o15nmcylfZh3yfAe1 etqnJTFD/Lb80LPbVWoyd3HrjA= Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=Hx-spam-relays-external:sk:tm18.bu, H*RU:sk:tm18.bu, H*RU:sk:nm42.bu, Hx-spam-relays-external:sk:nm42-vm X-HELO: nm42-vm9.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com Date: Sat, 13 Aug 2016 03:19:27 +0000 (UTC) From: Brent Reply-To: Brent To: "cygwin AT cygwin DOT com" Message-ID: <1225077593.13277666.1471058367999.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com> Subject: chere mintty window position MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <1225077593 DOT 13277666 DOT 1471058367999 DOT JavaMail DOT yahoo DOT ref AT mail DOT yahoo DOT com> >Frank Fesevur wrote: >>2016-08-12 6:04 GMT+02:00 Brent: >>>Thomas Wolff wrote: >>>How about mintty -w max or -w full instead? >> >> Thanks, I am going to try that tomorrow. > >I'm not use, but I think Thomas meant that as a possible yet to be written command line option. OK, I misunderstood. Good thing that I was too busy to day to try it out then. Yes, a mintty option like -w max or -w full would be perfect. I look forward to trying it! -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple