X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:content-type:mime-version:subject:from :in-reply-to:date:content-transfer-encoding:message-id :references:to; q=dns; s=default; b=nr23fkeQN67mccS2gUWl7t42lAEi iSMdzYJR/yaw82PTMNlEbe15NPNMQp+j8Zub0G06ok7kDbZwBSWr7J938qo+ULof UF3He/YGDMRa8kShknV2TtPdbrY0xy/KoKT/z8ydCHzToY2sMM5NkSaiDXy93x3A O7pokFPFN9A95KQ= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:content-type:mime-version:subject:from :in-reply-to:date:content-transfer-encoding:message-id :references:to; s=default; bh=LdKzclS6WqL6SsUPe6HCAuiJV9w=; b=up aNYCAD0SvWv5ZCztbjjLlfEb94qI5X9WncEYZQYP0x59HzpAQAEIeXnzV91lAa8z xK83dQNykSCShOUnBxeEIs2jGQQBM7f8ZPEMpk3r6pP6TaGdrAEI09Qy44b+w9D5 U7JP7V81mBu9YM+o8uTtZRYTbIwGxY/J2SK5zQD3Y= Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?No, score=0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=gates, Gates, wasn=e2, wasn?= X-HELO: gproxy8-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.1 cv=KaJB72oD c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=x/h8IXy5FZdipniTS+KQtQ==:117 a=x/h8IXy5FZdipniTS+KQtQ==:17 a=L9H7d07YOLsA:10 a=9cW_t1CCXrUA:10 a=s5jvgZ67dGcA:10 a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10 a=CnPQkyIfcMwA:10 a=xmZoPxhebIwA:10 a=7z1cN_iqozsA:10 a=jJwwl4nsAAAA:8 a=N0ZWB2MORl0ChkApZ7cA:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 a=nuJu0hy8CJQabtbxGZNE:22 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\)) Subject: Re: PATHEXT is fundamental to Windows and Should be recognised by CYGWIN From: Vince Rice In-Reply-To: <0D835E9B9CD07F40A48423F80D3B5A704BB88251@USA7109MB022.na.xerox.net> Date: Fri, 5 Aug 2016 13:44:55 -0500 Message-Id: <36FD437F-4B80-4994-B3B5-FBA599E1F756@solidrocksystems.com> References: <0D835E9B9CD07F40A48423F80D3B5A704BB88251 AT USA7109MB022 DOT na DOT xerox DOT net> To: "cygwin AT cygwin DOT com" X-Identified-User: {3986:box867.bluehost.com:solidrr2:solidrocksystems.com} {sentby:smtp auth 192.154.176.197 authed with vrice AT solidrocksystems DOT com} X-Exim-ID: 1bVk7B-0008ON-Lf X-Source-Sender: ([10.1.84.178]) [192.154.176.197]:51903 X-Source-Auth: vrice AT solidrocksystems DOT com X-Email-Count: 0 X-Source-Cap: c29saWRycjI7c29saWRycjI7Ym94ODY3LmJsdWVob3N0LmNvbQ== X-IsSubscribed: yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id u75IjkL8029663 The choice to use slashes as qualifers instead of dashes was “just to be different” as well. This was ’78-81. VMS wasn’t in Gates’ mind at the time. > On Aug 5, 2016, at 1:14 PM, Nellis, Kenneth wrote: > > From: Erik Soderquist >> ... DOS did a lot of things >> against already established conventions, such as using a backslash >> instead of a forward slash as the directory separator, just "to be >> different". > > Not just to be different, but to distinguish from slashes used as > command qualifiers (a la VMS), don't you think? > > --Ken Nellis -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple