X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date
	:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=default; b=n5Bs4RLtrb1VDC23
	wswkE5/mGjH4/dK4B23T0RqhHgfSOI7hxMr+Iq0bj+nuTiZLeb1HaRHrR2TzGiZs
	jql3LDPn+aOusxoWdEckJeE7EuaEmuX4iix3M2ElDNM+rRAGdLJugdeGdKPigJPr
	OcaecPGFmu+RT6A3dT7nDRCNsJg=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date
	:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=4YQcYSb8Ug1vuwV1xhkwwS
	hlGXw=; b=Usn483pWEBeVlkzU3V4N1Y9UElolZAiNdtxxoMdN7e8ZUzNDwLIMi2
	Ks2U/6IKgikqye2zyuZGqjU6POPOwxacu/22WzhWBeHADFr/cvQT3oAlsWgMfnGl
	KgpPLGWYjjo2/IgsxSjCmicoTF9rAaFLJx03arX0sVUEXsvO3+I0o=
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=1.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=no version=3.3.2 spammy=sans, bold, UD:zip, H*RU:sk:mrelaye
X-HELO: mout.kundenserver.de
Subject: Re: Mintty 2.4.0 and Deja Vu Sans Mono 2.35: issue with bold
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References: <f5bfurgc8hn DOT fsf AT troutbeck DOT inf DOT ed DOT ac DOT uk> <57840508 DOT 4080308 AT towo DOT net> <f5b37neao66 DOT fsf AT troutbeck DOT inf DOT ed DOT ac DOT uk> <FD39AB8C-C64B-4880-8B1D-8FE43723A9E0 AT etr-usa DOT com> <57854454 DOT 2090305 AT towo DOT net> <CAOC2fq9GKYCasehtNsQgPO_9Y-Ln6y7CM4n5cevxdY2eDFYYKw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <92f7d6c0-8449-def3-0d6c-5af7799d06ff AT towo DOT net> <578696E8 DOT 80409 AT towo DOT net>
From: Thomas Wolff <towo AT towo DOT net>
Message-ID: <578E7861.1070300@towo.net>
Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2016 20:58:41 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <578696E8.80409@towo.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:10cMTGvJtMw=:Axencsr5sbU6rmp5iAYnvF u96nfVvdpqb8CK6ZAFPdqjTcIwjSpNSJvN9nm/6y2Nqq5sm55HA7rOY1l75XBLsSwMtoK0IjE 3I0YYpa+gaEwKMV1CYR7KDOcOth9o84CdlCGES6FcGyImdnqYr1P3A6lQQx41SVnQhjFS0OXl 2VYFYPKbtiE9vUNaxMExnxWVADnTXWwbE+mIaLLG/czspdXuFNMbImRpIthuMp/Lk32kxqDKb og4PfrcieonIVcACBynFRB8nFbGAEn/PGLEI9h/6NIcXtzYmIfXrNHxb0oIOGmnlGK8wWvDfz z4TT8IaZn1EpBO6EB19q83kI5/1nF/vVD9VqYUPTclJPySUaXAjeaz9h93Jxamlg1XDlDXn4o ngeGne2PBT2XXYsCrFDepBZHdFnrziQhY/xVVPZjF5eb6m7UGS9iC1gwLRwvCVGpIJD5mo39X zoFVBpmiOPJelJlyKmIwH8iAJQphrVOgwm2JJcHoRYoEM/de3/5htzupU6IzEyB7iBIy8px/D OeUHs695tf826SJnJwbNOWENW89j/hCgRIv5o5rH1028MV2cSNUeedwPx/gdWBo0kwCoKJgPw CTxs2Oj+w4I68MGKPAptG022Js4o7cKGz48J3SefrBQsKxKSSYWlh2Pq+RXjQC9oSRoFlWWQq u3EYTjBiqzcXcl5xjzjSD3bO3ci0uG1A7uWxmJYq347inj7KjnomcRmKSMG/1kGZfO99C0DGG 0TOoIYSbMy4qgRKg
X-IsSubscribed: yes

Am 13.07.2016 um 21:30 schrieb Thomas Wolff:
> Am 13.07.2016 um 07:56 schrieb Thomas Wolff:
>> Am 12.07.2016 um 22:35 schrieb Michael Enright:
>>> On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 12:26 PM, Thomas Wolff wrote:
>>>> Mintty generates "faux-bold" by overstriking with a pixel offset of 
>>>> 1. Maybe
>>>> it should scale the thickness with the font size (like it does now for
>>>> manual underline and VT100 line drawing graphics), at increased 
>>>> risk of
>>>> clipping, however.
>>>>
>>>> Suggestions welcome.
>>>> Thomas
>>> I assume you have already tried quite a few suggestions. Did you try
>>> digitally inflating the bitmap image of the normal weight characters?
>> No; apart from how to find a suitable algorithm, this would bypass the
>> system font rendering, including smoothing/Cleartype, so likely not have
>> good results.
>>
>>> Did you try using the metrics from the normal weight while rendering
>>> with the bold weight?
>> The bold font is requested to be created with the same metrics ...
> Actually, it isn't. Found the root cause.
Fixed in https://github.com/mintty/mintty/archive/master.zip
> Thomas

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple