X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date
	:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=default; b=rtxoht0JtXa7ow/9
	6xXnv6DZ81pUWjCFiGUvGTr8XnicXDERw82pq0+tYpeJVxCm3IQmkuFiHPCMXYXL
	wMtHT0BG5trawiz/t/kEzK/w0/BktPbyVBKEUa4etO0PXU2kHUjKbSwBUjVWXJf6
	nZZKnz3NdspcWntZ2Inbqaa6I/g=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date
	:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=HYqzZONHUyj04bDW0wx6hy
	EgG1U=; b=hmcOAo3WeT6koYSOjiQ0Hu/Lym3JZiWK00mCjzZIrc8TVm/NwbRFix
	EWB0H1zL263N/HH177fk0VvoQO0SGCzIdbhWmcFRtvLKxSftRc5ZKM6EYTXoN3lr
	TuT4H190BDAl+BLPeDOSJmU8nqgG8GWMJolzURz+MdOJccfmoOzko=
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=4.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50,FOREIGN_BODY,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=no version=3.3.2 spammy=auf, wurde, diese, enright
X-HELO: mout.kundenserver.de
Subject: Re: Mintty 2.4.0 and Deja Vu Sans Mono 2.35: issue with bold
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References: <f5bfurgc8hn DOT fsf AT troutbeck DOT inf DOT ed DOT ac DOT uk> <57840508 DOT 4080308 AT towo DOT net> <f5b37neao66 DOT fsf AT troutbeck DOT inf DOT ed DOT ac DOT uk> <FD39AB8C-C64B-4880-8B1D-8FE43723A9E0 AT etr-usa DOT com> <57854454 DOT 2090305 AT towo DOT net> <CAOC2fq9GKYCasehtNsQgPO_9Y-Ln6y7CM4n5cevxdY2eDFYYKw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
From: Thomas Wolff <towo AT towo DOT net>
Message-ID: <92f7d6c0-8449-def3-0d6c-5af7799d06ff@towo.net>
Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2016 07:56:08 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.1.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAOC2fq9GKYCasehtNsQgPO_9Y-Ln6y7CM4n5cevxdY2eDFYYKw@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:qQVvkOKDBRk=:kodZ/sgqH2QhmHmfU1azuW BA/YjF1gr7vEASDPbx4oKhC1yDL7ZjHO7YbmSys3h4+e/4ELT3fSzRTHAIVSLMcIJQ3BGf7Q2 tlFH9Dw04Rk6uDWjlCeaFXvbRBFeQr+WM7GKmGEBFiPtZ3zAW1Y0GxC6uwWgFGYwwpcC+1g6v 90NhH8MXHe9hRvCEOX4t1KlnfbEdDQacFb/vY/kRJeADS90ROyGWqnxTUUuXvn7woAKwEUNnV qj++HlNv/YX+TfoNxVY0Cz709QyKuSFFc8fwLoRYHDkXFSg//GY1XxjAkiPfAVhV1RzZqf2gb yalxP5vugDqAnlRqDbTiDC55JC0DAdu2JCzol9mSVwkbtvkE6jPIkl/khzbuoYbGyE/r6zbZo hHoK9sc6tMrR2IDzsARWdZc47oAMI8o4X0BgLGYuoZOfc/DQCOPdy/N3NAQo3XrKcKZTJQ2re pSmkBiYRWuYCZ9Gzp/NLcUtqDeb3LU4YMfZsHrh+5zS6pkm6cn/JbblTbmduYmmEXxsocWpuP DE0T6+XHdX274xzDaTwFCK0wBhQBCJpL3JLyPKXuYGl4CMHEEF5EyI6KzBv+77ONRS1mT/UYu u6co6Fiz4YRRdzZGJIG8VB1kx+XYa4MMG3FXr7LMXjdGopHeRBBca41xUZpxw2LqoSHKwURqA Z/PccXg1PY0sIFtPr02gwtc85DoZQl0bPr2fJ6tKXnAQyZCZLTkRFOlLIYBPNWXEyltPK6SBX EY69ni7yzGS9DOvQ
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id u6D5uXFP020707

Am 12.07.2016 um 22:35 schrieb Michael Enright:
> On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 12:26 PM, Thomas Wolff wrote:
>> Mintty generates "faux-bold" by overstriking with a pixel offset of 1. Maybe
>> it should scale the thickness with the font size (like it does now for
>> manual underline and VT100 line drawing graphics), at increased risk of
>> clipping, however.
>>
>> Suggestions welcome.
>> Thomas
> I assume you have already tried quite a few suggestions. Did you try
> digitally inflating the bitmap image of the normal weight characters?
No; apart from how to find a suitable algorithm, this would bypass the
system font rendering, including smoothing/Cleartype, so likely not have
good results.

> Did you try using the metrics from the normal weight while rendering
> with the bold weight?
The bold font is requested to be created with the same metrics but turns
out to be created with different metrics.
There is no adjustment option during text output (which uses the Windows
function ExtTextOut), and "rendering" is done by Windows.

Thomas

---
Diese E-Mail wurde von Avast Antivirus-Software auf Viren geprüft.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus


--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple