X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=default; b=qmP0pwWhoPqi2rDP 1Eq/pKK3miSuse9x18oo8a9i1cI/EnI1dKE5TSyFps8GYvZvYRVxL7qXZN0MFEfK uUtAUpNqdXtbRV3TJyWS2/aR00tXQYzaVZi6c3Oml5RVJaBfXLVTXWh74JX1MzeB S/bhQEmehq01uTJyFOnIMudogCc= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=jCkfMG2YJSt+KQsVuqZrA9 u1diE=; b=FsJKgD/8akGKFha70blj0WB6Qu/m+7bQlgYSVfTcx0Tp21dYwyVgVZ Lrws/eN+UNCflFMNI2I8tiHE1Aa6ezHpmh1uVEIpYDj8QlzioL1goiJc1RxkBfAE gnDxImiKS6J32d8yUQZpxEcu75n3h//jYM77zom9vGabkH+im81TI= Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=0.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=UD:m, pm, extensively, UD:p.m X-HELO: mail-pf0-f173.google.com X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:organization :message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=SBdA3nlrx1il5S9kWKOVhzAfvLVQJfo82jM6iybYE8I=; b=E2a+EsP0wsehw/JIumaZN8w8/x2SYRz+c08LOItgZZ7tuxC/7jhlWp+WcI1oI02cKB Dzb+ryQepZdy9DLm6dilwKy7qYSXE8AqrYBKdpp98RfNjNSWYXSLq8WQZygrud21ufcj QCi9ZfBS2NaC/dELydqzOzGDlA+4BphLD8KaQMYJfgkuUH+LnqXwW4UXM9D9nRkXPNhG Pdy2TbwapoWdRgJn8ZBDNgCM/uaipwAoKtMvKmtqTvZgNQjnu3W8k47RsOzb/VetM6vs YarRTRjGIMBnTNaybVuZpvd3QQ69MUVlEh7sDGh2vVpaPVtOmYw3he88PWWm1nnYgKcG 5v/A== X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tJZNK3LrK7nnSuWYtzh6zohFL+tIpXMWpZirfJF7dC2rqn9nDsRTxZsQUwdyWUTcg== X-Received: by 10.98.65.2 with SMTP id o2mr8570391pfa.97.1466637056196; Wed, 22 Jun 2016 16:10:56 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: Octave/HDF5 library/header mismatch To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <93d9b19e-d234-b2db-65be-e65f828a9df6 AT photonicinnovations DOT com> <6d5164b3-75e6-e7c0-1095-3e61363bd9fa AT gmail DOT com> From: Gavin King Message-ID: <391d5f0b-aebc-71a0-2287-8010dd4f108b@photonicinnovations.com> Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2016 11:11:18 +1200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.1.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <6d5164b3-75e6-e7c0-1095-3e61363bd9fa@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes On 21/06/2016 9:03 p.m., Marco Atzeri wrote: > On 21/06/2016 06:20, Gavin King wrote: >> Reverting the package libhdf5_10 from the current version 1.8.17-1 to >> the previous version 1.8.16-1 means that octave 4.0.1-1 can save the >> workspace. >> >> So: workaround: revert libhdf5_10 to 1.8.16-1. Presumably, the current >> version of octave was compiled at an inopportune point; I don't think >> this is something that I can remedy myself, is it? > > the official workaround is mentioned on the warning message > > "You can, at your own risk, disable this warning by setting the > environment variable 'HDF5_DISABLE_VERSION_CHECK' to a value of '1'. > Setting it to 2 or higher will suppress the warning messages totally. > Headers are 1.8.16, library is 1.8.17" > > so if you use, before running octave > > export HDF5_DISABLE_VERSION_CHECK=1 > > you will still see the warning but the action will be completed > > export HDF5_DISABLE_VERSION_CHECK=2 > > will suppress also the warning. > That is slightly scary, since the warning says "Data corruption or segmentation faults may occur if the application continues." Segfaults aside, the prospect of data corruption is unpleasant. > >> I think this is the correct place to report this to; it isn't a problem >> per se with the individual programs, but with the way they're packed >> together. I think. Do correct me if I am wrong; I'm a bit new to this >> whole business. >> > > It is the right place. > This problem is clearly a hdf5 upstream problem and a questionable > design choice. > > I am following with them > > https://lists.hdfgroup.org/pipermail/hdf-forum_lists.hdfgroup.org/2016-June/009564.html > Thanks for looking further into it, and for you advice. I'll follow this progress with interest, since I use octave and cygwin rather extensively. yours Gavin -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple