X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:mime-version:message-id:from:to:subject
	:content-type:date:in-reply-to:references; q=dns; s=default; b=R
	F4/5ivXLFR58EhkArEeGrRT87bWz+odWDItlDPzS8IqdFjLyhBwcxbi+/N8TC+Wp
	1eWjlUU0qaFumjdJ/G8woRrv/tBO7uZt01NISTJ8WWGF0ooJvAh7eWawbxt1hvPB
	bjaGk1ix/yLcIT0CBsXNDH7vCaI7TNtCdWeTKo5mzI=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:mime-version:message-id:from:to:subject
	:content-type:date:in-reply-to:references; s=default; bh=LAQRof5
	AFdeoDOtcEQ6Ug9eOHp4=; b=NBIhgcCuBCrB51Xs16Z95+3dY/AIChwXQUF726o
	D2hIgl6nBH3KaeltWuGPVInUXOxwOUcODhslmwPDZgBqt0yA9p6GwF/d3lOZhI5x
	S6kFSfqt6jBRDpn9A0LGUcf/l11Jbn3uLl7y3qrYZQimarVID/sxSQ6irZ/ocEfI
	Nux0=
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_40,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=HImportance:normal, AR, HSensitivity:Normal, Ken
X-HELO: mout.gmx.net
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <trinity-4f46c890-4f51-4e11-a248-0acf33eebf50-1466200480864@3capp-gmx-bs03>
From: "Mark McGregor" <mark DOT mcgregor AT gmx DOT de>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: xdvipdfmx:fatal: This font using the "seac" command for accented characters...
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2016 23:54:40 +0200
Sensitivity: Normal
In-Reply-To: <1465890352.69476.ezmlm@cygwin.com>
References: <1465890352 DOT 69476 DOT ezmlm AT cygwin DOT com>
X-UI-Message-Type: mail
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:B7QJlQNijm4=:RRBIElYvHErmZo2UuM+zt7 XKbwjIPtfNH9nbB8qnVHCzSNGrJgd1qMVv0lfFFS1P0/uhhD3kNr2WmS9AYPNQ0Ha5jlizURX vEN9DgqxZtbNX98cWYWFzEKBmJgeY/Rs5CJg7xJRqkKM2gexu/TtOsEG/2vEn/odgdX2xbl93 /sF73vFToGFxE41OnJvf8tVmH6wpf75GsypPr5MSKBRUo/Zy8YNl2Pc4eqjkp0ZoBwB5DbM2C NUr4SjB/ekH9GpJAYvAiojrAvaxtRcUz22IhlFw+PwT3wmSqwnCp9tgnbZhazgSf/5xDzmr8S EbAqxNvKodvQFBmFK/nciFS6x7ybbcwUvFdsVDVZR5Fac+nJHVeG2avxE1aupif5gk7gQu825 rH56cDaqkSb3P5bvDQWKlhc21MgkDSLj20+4fnfRVxmdescTRW+SwEarzJtEGJoK+9lwiSAAJ 4ksxDX0RBg==

----Ken wrote:
> Ken, thank you!
> (You might probably have more experience with XeTeX than me. Is XeTeX
> dying? The last bugfix was in March, months ago, and apart from A.R.
> nobody seems to work on it anyway...)

No, I don't think XeTeX is dying. A look at its git repository shows lots of commits from Jonathan Kew and Arthur Reutenauer in the last few months. 
----

The last commit was over 1 month ago: a 1-line change from JK. I'm not overly optimistic that anything will happen to this bug report at all. But, anyway, thank you for having reported!

Mark.

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple