X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date
	:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=default; b=PG0hMDEVTlRIa5fd
	Ru8rMzt+QHkJqqtpDDtgyR5IGh3O/ns8MJ4OVuyXvHRucXxG/71oyzCRWit+xRLX
	/fPqV6ddYrv2+to6l2GBdtFQVJoKNYWewEjMAEa0hI/vp5TQR1VeQb0YfwTKMDOp
	sRgiUtmX/hJG+nHmfohUJjvIf5A=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date
	:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=Nnj8NCUQNIn6lh930P4+/6
	BbctM=; b=pZfn54kO0VL1pacZDOL/XAK4QqNQOaD9DPH3CaReSSWLCwLUs4UfvP
	oaSIoTwphKVn3Yxzsz2gTCGkeCmkgiyHy62CA1Z+cs8cXrsMkVaEzfJ8LvlRAKH/
	7HySeTGWDLWS1gP0+BX/0Y/ePAE/Da4rJSSGkIN7Cdk+NI5Vtqqrw=
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=ANNOUNCEMENT, 04, plot, 0.4
X-HELO: mail-wm0-f66.google.com
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;        d=1e100.net; s=20130820;        h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date         :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding;        bh=MgEwHqAO/zOKBn/Ey8zSOkb2GmBbosLYRqhdy+fcsMs=;        b=dkm/la54FOxmDWoI9RgQJ8KjaFR61vyDyaumFmpVOZ4CpxRH06aDE2TyMERiEs6LOx         azlq43PdSI4EbKQj3pEYBeJ5iNTFI97rjJWfyuSTNaj/4tLN2/ycfjmhpvXxeDS0NTO0         wlyuXgXJZkxeeRSRSpYFj/9WaCLeywCKV5geeWPnf7lg8Dk5whKVuMK/uoTdr1pY0jf/         DQkrIKD2UmNyH6avN1yP4tVAwQsTuzEI5S/zhAGoIw7lkOxMgF3agv89Xl9YGHD52TeC         9/VYt8IpJoBWtTaLqtIo0wtrTfC/yl0cR64TMF/JUOoqifByNFiZqAutEOwui5b1eCbt         Ojmw==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tL56WjmyBWutdGaGXXuEaw1z0goIfq07jlbpf8JSjVzqiHEfjYnPJmgx+V/B772Ow==
X-Received: by 10.194.24.38 with SMTP id r6mr2650974wjf.88.1464169040263;        Wed, 25 May 2016 02:37:20 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] mesa 11.0.9-2
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References: <announce DOT 201602220900 DOT u1M90xBM023169 AT int-mx11 DOT intmail DOT prod DOT int DOT phx2 DOT redhat DOT com> <570D122B DOT 50307 AT gmail DOT com> <570DAFFA DOT 7020700 AT cygwin DOT com>
From: Marco Atzeri <marco DOT atzeri AT gmail DOT com>
Message-ID: <9db412c8-4a84-72e4-cec8-978d8b8bccd5@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 25 May 2016 11:37:11 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <570DAFFA.7020700@cygwin.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-IsSubscribed: yes

On 13/04/2016 04:33, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote:
> On 2016-04-12 10:20, Marco Atzeri wrote:
>> we found a case where the 32bit is segfaulting
>> while dri-drivers-11.0.9-1
>> works fine.
>> For reference:
>> https://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2016-04/msg00245.html
>> https://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2016-04/msg00251.html
>>
>> To replicate with octave is enough :
>> run from xterm
>>    /usr/bin/octave-cli-4.0.1.exe
>>
>>   x=1:100;
>>   plot(x,x)
>>
>> However I see that also mesa-demos segfault
>>
>> $ cd /usr/lib/mesa-demos
>> $ ./quad-clip.exe
>> GL_RENDERER   = Gallium 0.4 on llvmpipe (LLVM 3.7, 256 bits)
>> GL_VERSION    = 3.0 Mesa 11.0.9
>> GL_VENDOR     = VMware, Inc.
>> Segmentation fault (core dumped)
>
> I can reproduce this on 32-bit but not 64-bit, and the same happens with
> 11.1.2.  It may be an issue with LLVM 3.7 (11.0.9-1 was built with 3.5)
> but without a useful backtrace it will be hard to pin down.
>

Hi Yaakov,

until the root cause is not pinned down,
can you re-put 11.0.9-1 as current for 32bit and
leave all the new version as tests ?

With current 11.2.2-1 and previous 11.2.1-1 both not working
we have an issue.

Regards
Marco


--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple