X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date
	:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=default; b=qiaAuIqy0/oRIBCs
	Pkd4EASTIPFn1DmRw8/Vh86F1ooCXvspBb/g4hDDwef7+JBRsdozJZt2YAgQ1fwx
	6Fsgb8NK/GdrKK4fFtzNLwrhOA5XEryyos2j/b5bHAnFmB+B+1VNI/ePdFpGf1Ko
	70dq0CuOmUHkqyKpiStfUXoJzbo=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date
	:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=1rxY+ckpIC4947uKXRSHA6
	/NPyU=; b=lpiY4E9jav7YQvPCNaBzfPZMhQd9bHcEJlAJB2J9YJmRlU29x38zmU
	MEsXkzmUWciEbpRh+cmYJxqUti651lPqrhfVstbwDM1/HOlChXs0d1pMznPu4XPt
	KmHDrMFx3q/EOQ2lDSE3vGSUrz8gzOfPiPw73Ery6DhGUNlolpGJM=
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=Hx-languages-length:435, H*Ad:D*cornell.edu, customer
X-HELO: limerock02.mail.cornell.edu
X-CornellRouted: This message has been Routed already.
Subject: Re: nm for .exe extensions?
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References: <a66eaf9339774b6a8fbc1ab4b99f428d AT ntmaexbe04 DOT bedford DOT progress DOT com>
From: Ken Brown <kbrown AT cornell DOT edu>
Message-ID: <a1b449e2-9063-a00d-cc49-df57b3ae57e1@cornell.edu>
Date: Tue, 24 May 2016 09:13:13 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <a66eaf9339774b6a8fbc1ab4b99f428d@ntmaexbe04.bedford.progress.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-PMX-Cornell-Gauge: Gauge=XXXXX
X-IsSubscribed: yes

On 5/24/2016 8:43 AM, Benjamin Cao wrote:
> I am working with a customer on using the nm command in Cygwin for Windows. The customer wants to be able to generate a symbol table on *.exe files similar to what nm does on unix platforms. The executable, when run with nm in Cygwin, results in a "no symbols" result, whereas it generates a symbol table in unix.

Is he running nm on stripped executables?

Ken

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple