X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date
	:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type; q=dns; s=default; b=qCPn
	UyZ2WXiuo3ia3aXIy3iLGXeOjHK0TYNtTQs/QuGfo6r9POFz+2JI1YKLsiqV151x
	4MnBkRt1gUxPLGJL22NyjAKVeTodjoaeb0SwJBKvIyG0A+pNa1Ey+IEYJWkZc0i0
	wE4/SdqEzWbDuDwDPGyvvQkSihCjlezKFP+Mo8c=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date
	:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type; s=default; bh=4fOTGaDeGn
	r7eFjDTEIfwQ/my+Q=; b=lkeIi63exRBRcCyRLWl7GEAZWWTLgMlzs66DEhALjX
	TT11mNO6uV+sqYKApDUe/vLP0g4+AJzoCQ+ebEO2OqsFYjR/vzHPPDWBl/E3iGmd
	ioPXDHdOoG1CiqFCviMCUijPMu165aOHPpwGgD3QHF6K6HFzdD1U75MO3ldQSN2M
	w=
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_20,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=marco DOT atzeri AT gmail DOT com, marcoatzerigmailcom, cname, filefrom
X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com
Subject: =?UTF-8?Q?Re:_tar_incremental_backups_and_ctime=e2=80=8f_problem?=
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References: <CAOKAGPP0o6vV2KTpfs4M0DyqwHA3pVw-+xkwLmjyWpAFthbA+A AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <9fdf98cf-e3d1-e453-1c98-2c206afe81c9 AT gmail DOT com> <CAOKAGPOzSYkmFRJazgQMwjUCKsKaBbE9gcVAdNnNvYUkmc=9Bw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <09f604cd-61df-e0c7-b313-1dcf1ef59b4e AT gmail DOT com> <CAOKAGPMHEiNLW3makusvvx2E7V9etjA+YPUMDh56=N42wmtLYA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <574313B3 DOT 3090703 AT redhat DOT com> <CAOKAGPOVnU1Lr2od-UbtRAeZHFKjnNC2jOmmGouVotSYMxbokw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <b2009993-f09a-c07f-f524-34266334c151 AT gmail DOT com> <CAOKAGPO=h=J-MWYxN_wqSSGPvAJKP0ks7-hc+iQnUr4NZBiAuQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
From: Eric Blake <eblake AT redhat DOT com>
Openpgp: url=http://people.redhat.com/eblake/eblake.gpg
Message-ID: <574353B2.8010006@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 23 May 2016 13:02:10 -0600
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAOKAGPO=h=J-MWYxN_wqSSGPvAJKP0ks7-hc+iQnUr4NZBiAuQ@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="M4NcLrs8uAQFxQbqs7St26AKn82gPogKD"
X-IsSubscribed: yes

--M4NcLrs8uAQFxQbqs7St26AKn82gPogKD
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On 05/23/2016 10:56 AM, x y wrote:
>> It is always possible to create file list with find and use that
>> to tar whatever using --files-from=3DFILE option
>=20
>> I don't see the need to change tar behaviour to meet your wish.
>=20
> Hi Marco,
>=20
> Consider that you are working in the IT department of a company and
> you have thousands of documents in your file server. Concerning the
> --file-from option, how can you guess the name of the files which are
> just only going to be viewed by the workers? Those files would be not
> modified but since the ctime stamp will be updated, they will be
> included in the next incremental backup. Why to lose time with the
> --files-from option and make things more difficult? Adding an option
> to tar.exe to ignore the cname time stamp during differential \
> incremental backups should be possible. This should be the natural
> method. Tools like rsync does not suffer from such problems so my
> request should make sense.

If it makes that much sense, then propose the extension upstream
(bug-tar AT gnu DOT org); once upstream implements it, Cygwin will pick it up
automatically.  Until then, I don't see a reason for Cygwin to
needlessly differ from upstream.

>=20
> On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 6:35 PM, Marco Atzeri <marco DOT atzeri AT gmail DOT com> wr=
ote:
>> On 23/05/2016 16:57, x y wrote:
>>>>
>>>> mtime is fakeable, ctime is not.  Using only mtime makes it likely that

You're still top-posting.  It's okay to trim the portion of the email
you don't reply to.


--=20
Eric Blake   eblake redhat com    +1-919-301-3266
Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org


--M4NcLrs8uAQFxQbqs7St26AKn82gPogKD
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2
Comment: Public key at http://people.redhat.com/eblake/eblake.gpg
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/

iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJXQ1OyAAoJEKeha0olJ0NqaaoH/AyRVQw6ud41kcIpjSmOhyTX
fLGSuQCszWlqs4HfhqFoYXq15V8kWWQQ9DNIuK5ktv6bkSp7YRs4MxcKLbDIMxxv
jYEfyjCk4H0ZEsXuEgCqOUiiwFFx2IOd2EUfA6deV4z0tMNPJ0L90EJLVxuatxrG
Bxx/3k6VyBzTdes6ARfJuzQ8+Tz6j7V92tBLSonhQEb/7eGpqFAAdtNOBWMvcYYX
j6I36daCzyQu84mcZ8jRCuXEuLYtXY+5oq9hibRnp+XvBgWCAVo2McYBBITmvWFz
NNZJKLmaPEsZTC5UJhGe7+nLlNG/6MMbI3uC4aGV4jz6QMCZdZXvukj9vkRNXvs=
=iiLP
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--M4NcLrs8uAQFxQbqs7St26AKn82gPogKD--