X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date
	:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=default; b=W95b74+8SCh/EPl9
	9/CGZ8omGZzDOV29Llp+6DdHPdU3Gk23MOP21Q9bvWXqOvSYTw7I5RGoGsUZ1xt1
	itoQ3mtKG2u8o8bhs/Q6CvbYmuYB3PajJBj/sRFi5j2te2u30izKXYCyFlV3iYvC
	iXC2/jT5ajHJlYe0SuwXaIBO9QE=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date
	:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=AzlttaPFdoP/yrGuyamY+d
	+sQUE=; b=KA1UE7VnbumqWjGK3owPHHZ5Lpje1h8GhORW9QPvmZaGcIMTmAGUsl
	3OI5UbTbvc1A7u+cvzawcl0ruvbZZ1RJXT/mhnbnxqfZ3VE9himjn8G6iTaPw2p9
	3QPqYnG5rKvz+N8XEGnE/pX9v2NeiU8qzSY+8ubg7jrc/CGbgti5I=
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=0.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_05,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=no version=3.3.2 spammy=H*M:cygwin, H*Ad:U*yselkowitz, Bonnet, bonnet
X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] clamav 0.99.1-1
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References: <announce DOT 201603301732 DOT u2UHW4eN011967 AT int-mx11 DOT intmail DOT prod DOT int DOT phx2 DOT redhat DOT com> <6da62132-1e66-41c9-043d-c552f4faf1c3 AT redhat DOT com>
From: Yaakov Selkowitz <yselkowitz AT cygwin DOT com>
Message-ID: <4f86f77b-e2cb-b654-760b-499623dd61a1@cygwin.com>
Date: Wed, 11 May 2016 10:18:00 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <6da62132-1e66-41c9-043d-c552f4faf1c3@redhat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-IsSubscribed: yes

On 2016-05-11 09:35, Mike Bonnet wrote:
> I'm seeing segfaults with this version when recursively scanning large
> directories. Running Cygwin x86_64 on Windows Server 2012.

But not with 0.99?  Have you been able to reproduce this on any other 
systems?

> In the past

When?

> this happened when some 32-bit files were in the source tree
> when the 64-bit version was built. It's possible this happened again.

Extremely unlikely.  cygport makes 32-bit and 64-bit builds in their own 
directories.

> Any chance we could get a new 64-bit build?

We'd need to find the real cause of this before it would be of any help. 
  I'd start with updating to 0.99.2, however we borrow Fedora's -norar 
sources but they haven't bumped yet (#1333949).

-- 
Yaakov

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple