X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:from:to:references:in-reply-to:subject:date :message-id:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=default; b=eUI0UhWqSVqZLL2OMLppoNQ0egoSfPwD2UAl1seuDIZ 8rBVkRrawfgKL5R1Re4risi3NPRIgcClsBGHZzuD+ktGIpof88MjhNZaMNqYNyLy BmIMdn+WQsa9U6hGee57vNJEWpf+l89idteTzIXdzjFl/q5dRdeG3pQXnADq+kbA = DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:from:to:references:in-reply-to:subject:date :message-id:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=Cr96mR1nSc/+NK8751NcMu4LGJk=; b=Woq4IGT0kUtv2EsEa 8ldH0rjnXNTMcWm+KjvNVdRGlm4AlYibhPk9iLEWqG0ZGbQPfb1nA2Nyv1gUVfvR LTpxTajA6JjZl+VkeNuolZ5wXr/j/0t6qaygodT2Pq24oGr0wlNZXq2/GesnUVLF 4DreQX1MZJLWNisXZ+snamEDEw= Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=2.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,LIKELY_SPAM_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=no version=3.3.2 spammy=H*UA:16.0, dcrt0cc, createprocess, api's X-HELO: outmail149080.authsmtp.com From: "David Allsopp" To: References: <005c01d1a6e2$30270ba0$907522e0$@metastack.com> In-Reply-To: Subject: RE: Formatting command line arguments when starting a Cygwin process from a native process Date: Fri, 6 May 2016 10:03:22 +0200 Message-ID: <000101d1a76d$c37c6b80$4a754280$@metastack.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" X-Server-Quench: 024ce601-1361-11e6-829e-00151795d556 X-AuthReport-Spam: If SPAM / abuse - report it at: http://www.authsmtp.com/abuse X-AuthRoute: OCd1ZAARAlZZVg1f DC4bFwdFRBksPQFF ChxFJgxfNlEYWhtQ NG5RP1VMMVtaTlZc TWYNRCkFGUJzWWJz ewpYZwVeaEhLEQdr U1ZIQldMFgRqHx0A AgEcVwZzOUBCfnZz GjU6XnFeWU14O0V7 Q0oaFW8CNjJmaGEC UUNedh5VcVZMYxdH YwViVHMMZGQAb380 QlJtKQocb31xLz5Q Sx0RLFQdCU0MGzs1 QRxKGTQpEAUMXSou KhEgNkVUA0YcNA0p LVI7RVMePFcbQiZP EF5MBmdBPV4KSjEw RQ1AWktWGXVbSDtd HBBgOgVPCTFJQUIA X-Authentic-SMTP: 61633634383431.1037:706 X-AuthFastPath: 0 (Was 255) X-AuthSMTP-Origin: 213.105.212.114/25 X-AuthVirus-Status: No virus detected - but ensure you scan with your own anti-virus system. Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id u4683i1E006215 [With apologies if threading is broken; I erroneously thought as the list was not subscriber-only that replies would use reply-all and so wasn't subscribed] On Thu, May 5, 2016 at 06:47 PM, Erik Soderquist wrote: > On Thu, May 5, 2016 at 11:24 AM, David Allsopp wrote: > > > > I am trying to work out the precise details for character escaping > > when starting a Cygwin process from a native (i.e. non-Cygwin) Windows > process. > > > For example: > > > > argv[0] = "foo" > > argv[1] = "bar baz" > > > > then the resulting command line string should be: > > > > lpCommandLine = "foo bar\" \"baz" > > If I recall correctly, Windows cmd.exe uses the carrot (^) as the general > escape from shell character, so > > C:\cygwin64\bin>.\echo.exe -e ^"hello\nworld^" > hello > world > > works. Indeed - but I'm not using cmd, or any shell for that matter (that's actually the point) - I am in a native Win32 process invoking a Cygwin process directly using the Windows API's CreateProcess call. As it happens, the program I have already has the arguments for the Cygwin process in an array, but Windows internally requires a single command line string (which is not in any related to Cmd). > However, I've found Windows's interpretation to be inconsistent, so often > have to play with it to find what the "right combination" is for a > particular instance. > > I find echoing the parameters to a temporary text file and then using the > file as input to be more reliable and easier to troubleshoot, and it > breaks apart whether it is Windows cli inconsistencies or receiving > program issues very nicely with the text file content as an intermediary This is an OK tack, but I don't wish to do this by experimentation and get caught out later by a case I didn't think of, so what I'm trying to determine is *exactly* how the Cygwin DLL processes the command line via its source code so that I can present it with my argv array converted to a single command line and be certain that the Cygwin will recover the same argv DLL. My reading of the relevant sources suggests that with globbing disabled, backslash escape sequences are *never* interpreted (since the quote function returns early - dcrt0.cc, line 171). If there is no way of encoding the double quote character, then perhaps I have to run with globbing enabled but ensure that the globify function will never actually expand anything - but as that's a lot of work, I was wondering if I was missing something with the simpler "noglob" case. David -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple