X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:to:from:subject:date:message-id:references :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s= default; b=pLOjQ/WWrrzhb6UMwdHF4wsbKAL4Cqb2GaWX+vla0uXD6ueCoFllj wDsMC2iG4FMIBbdF/mMyHTJcIXuxmGvIIFzDNx1FBP6jYrXhY/5TKSA1iWe4b4Wl tDo7ZBEIqIRyFM9Eas4Q5BZT6rPq3ImhiM9YOgtSmDFLBLs48BoNic= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:to:from:subject:date:message-id:references :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=yNlJG+sikJ7/mJU0Zjp7syTsO6I=; b=hCmuPqS9p4ZreQlxLCJzFG/Jzrrd nsTFDjGD5m0+Wq5M4o11Vx4ZTLLwrHVwMoxOyVcjJNYZ7U80+P+DI9fs6qnk0QTa Ci7ln5A+Km2woz1FGTvolPi3S7pp3xC1vXI5I5LwEVOApyFuVtsK7bQt6tgtqLpS OvjWjBgB7VXUX+w= Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=1.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50,FSL_HELO_BARE_IP_2,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=no version=3.3.2 spammy=installations, installs, dab, rwp X-HELO: plane.gmane.org To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com From: Achim Gratz Subject: Re: Process map and fork problems Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2016 10:37:59 +0000 (UTC) Lines: 24 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: Loom/3.14 (http://gmane.org/) X-IsSubscribed: yes Achim Gratz NexGo.DE> writes: > I'm chasing a problem on some 32bit Windows installs that supposedly > happened after one of the Windows updates (and probably other software > updates) in the last few months (the affected users were unable to pin it > down further unfortunately). It's obviously caused by two heap sections in > the process map that are smack dab in the middle of the address range used > by rebase: > > 20000000-200A0000 rw-p 00000000 0000:0000 0 [heap] > 200A0000-38000000 ===p 000A0000 0000:0000 0 [heap] > > These do not exist on 32bit Cygwin installs on 64bit Windows installations, > so I couldn't see these problems on my test machine. On the 64bit Windows installations two eerily similar heap sections appear much higher in the process image: 80000000-80070000 rw-p 00000000 0000:0000 0 [heap] 80070000-98000000 ===p 00070000 0000:0000 0 [heap] Hm.... why would something like that move from 2GB down to 0.5GB? Regards, Achim. -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple