X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; q=dns; s=default; b=oyKx 3yGK/F4nzZF3jnaEJC9vQDmAU9OtOs3OQoL33LNNRoE2Rziva/OBav5P708DoG95 lWPdpvMSyqlL7BKNTPysAIDxU8RURYh0PhT22NCQChvMoU26HyjOuecMUFlbfvPh HwPuJ5XfMRTjvLyUSkQyO7CUVEzbDHfbHfKB/GI= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; s=default; bh=u+x71v5z+a PfdTxNBPR+7kwk/CE=; b=bHaUqzeXb+givL56zzdsyQCuJpSbOVO6+izBeP8dcD D3TgCMFAzprAAXp5imqM2PV4Vtsf5aY+CUFiHiCIPgAdbqkP9s6DAtxCHfvwVzmr +yZdFZQFG8OzB+a11uQBMh8pJqL05HBlNCq9b9hFSwlgv2tYBgvuHTpM6gjg1Tfn w= Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: Yes, score=5.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPAM_BODY,SPF_PASS autolearn=no version=3.3.2 spammy=civil, indian, Indian, karl X-HELO: earth.ccil.org Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2016 09:21:11 -0400 From: John Cowan To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: native Linux userland in Windows 10 Message-ID: <20160413132111.GB3162@mercury.ccil.org> References: <416uDmm4T7200S05 DOT 1460552179 AT web05 DOT cms DOT usa DOT net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <416uDmm4T7200S05.1460552179@web05.cms.usa.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-IsSubscribed: yes KARL BOTTS scripsit: > Remember, they have tried basically the same thing at least twice > before: the "POSIX Subsystem" of WinNT, and the "Unix Tools for Windows". Actually, Microsoft hasn't. The Posix subsystem never did anything useful and was just a cynical hack to satisfy government checklists. Must support Posix -- check. But most limits were set as low as they could go. OpenNT/Interix/WSU was a third-party product, and was an entirely separate implementation of Posix, not quite matching any existing OS. I ported a large proprietary Linux C++ program to it as a proof of concept, and there were a lot of issues but it did eventually work. The intention here is to match the Linux kernel, at least up to a point (and nobody knows what that point is). > I could be wrong. I'll give it a year or two to settle, and then give it a > try. I just hope it does not interfere too much with my Cygwin setup, which I > expect to keep for the foreseeable future. It definitely doesn't affect Cygwin in any way. -- John Cowan http://www.ccil.org/~cowan cowan AT ccil DOT org "Your honour puts yourself to much trouble correcting my English and doubtless the final letter will be much better literature; but it will go from me Mukherji to him Bannerji, and he Bannerji will understand it a great deal better as I Mukherji write it than as your honour corrects it." --19th-century Indian civil servant to his British superior -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple