DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date
	:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=default; b=tZjZF5yj7i2imy/K
	ntP+Y5EZKSTsk2ONgwK3O0+bbhp7Oqj94qnz977MMb9OL3dxSlX1+S5VveW63k6r
	cqPQdwOEcdb5TwmWXOUNyQjSptB2hIuAOc0In/RAP6V+qIzUMqpHi75fiaMyjYv9
	UEzo24NnMDfm80GTw9S+BVCEKU8=
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: Mintty font problem
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References: <014uDkmQD5520S08 DOT 1460378583 AT web08 DOT cms DOT usa DOT net> <570C0BC0 DOT 6070205 AT towo DOT net>
From: Thomas Wolff <towo AT towo DOT net>
Message-ID: <570D5A16.7050303@towo.net>
Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2016 22:27:02 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <570C0BC0.6070205@towo.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Am 11.04.2016 um 22:40 schrieb Thomas Wolff:
> Am 11.04.2016 um 14:43 schrieb KARL BOTTS:
>>
>> Perhaps related to font issues in mintty: In .minttyrc is a new property
>> FontWeight=700,
> which means you had configured the bold version of the font.
>> after I installed Cygwin 2.4.1-1 and mintty 2.3.5. (I noticed,
>> only because I have home dir files in revision control.)  I too use 
>> Lucida Console.
>>   With the 700, the font looked visibly "skinny" to me.
> actually, rather the normal, non-bold font. The new font weight 
> adjustment apparently enforces that although you selected bold (unless 
> an even bolder weight would exist in the font family).
> Maybe the font selection should be tweaked to allow selecting a bold 
> font even at the cost of not having a bolder variant available.
Actually, it does allow that, as can be seen with some other fonts. The 
issue with Lucida Console is that it does not have a bold weight, so 
there is only the Normal (400) weight which is then selected by the new 
font weight tweaking algorithm.

>> I set it to 800, looks fine now.  No problem, just tinkering required.
This is obviously inconsistent with the behaviour of mapping 700 to Normal.

Thomas

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple