X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:to:from:subject:date:message-id:references :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s= default; b=QdNG9mGja8+HcK++WOgg4ZyUXE0C2dJBLQC4KDAiCePfNM24TX/p4 cK3oQyzl6Dkf6THpp8aIn5ufDifkivj2BZdJbHOgAa/dlkI7Y4B/Pm//0AjDuSdC QCYXIjO7+YvJBqUFPnepItKEetfAI+RLiEcFoxmKw+ZlI9jAr5MzJ4= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:to:from:subject:date:message-id:references :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=Cqn+N68dk0/CZT3rv2yk11YLHdA=; b=jF5ff4FZXlleHvhXjZyyEvNpN05+ QmOlaS/DDo9TcWuWJrFRYIGbeb9lCk7NQsSk9EJAhcFHnS+PhU5UvaUXACmZPg3R m75EbDr/qxDHLIy/xwO49jlHkHuD0eJPGV13GFZ7+bSuYmQDS5D8p6KovYsXJkS9 h7Ly9NPMv5LHp0o= Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-0.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=Hx-languages-length:942, umbrella, speak, news X-HELO: plane.gmane.org To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com From: Mark Geisert Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: coreutils-8.25-1 Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2016 06:52:22 +0000 (UTC) Lines: 20 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: Loom/3.14 (http://gmane.org/) X-IsSubscribed: yes Eric Blake writes: [...a bunch of good news elided...] > If you missed the note in 8.23-2, there is no longer an 'su' program in > coreutils; this is an upstream decision (many Linux distros are getting > su from other packages, and even though cygwin's su had come from > coreutils, it was heavily patched and doesn't work as smoothly as on > Linux). I'm still debating whether it is worth trying to capture the > last release of coreutils' su, as patched to work on cygwin, for > distribution as an independent package; help would be appreciated from > anyone else interested in this task. I can't answer to whether it's worth saving :-) but if it is, I think I can help. Has it diverged enough into Windows-isms that it could fit under the cygutils umbrella? Either there or as a separate su package works for me. Anybody out there using 'su'? Speak now, or forever hold the pieces. ..mark -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple