X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:date:from:reply-to:message-id:to:subject
	:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=default; b=lFQSH9IcHlELlvq5
	n+OnJ012wtAq1bmZziMt8PEpLcoG/gtUcaM+g+jCikFIwPj7X93A2hnBO3ftzQY1
	2fvncRvBgqTSu+VST/yJhf04GWikv8x5COavFgCxyZ28xUvuWuTV6bVKqP7hLNWi
	QPxgRkjngw84ZumFaxuGAfdbVWw=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:date:from:reply-to:message-id:to:subject
	:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=Q1ET6y+2O7KTzf91tRYbHr
	9aRtI=; b=knQn3tsc4/Tl5mwyoICtOmxCtQmvVxtNfMCjY+svOR9rPRGwZ3bHz8
	FPnsYawS/RIDbvITzz8sKYBvRLhReutkLZkuBi4bIWJN8P9XNiJjWg6CVMSsDPrV
	hTODSfu9vIvk/tIl9BzXuVRn/x6Trq/EsAsVKpwAM18h/ouY1J0oE=
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=4.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50,FREEMAIL_FROM,KAM_THEBAT,SPF_SOFTFAIL autolearn=no version=3.3.2 spammy=H*UA:Bat!, H*x:Bat!, H*F:D*yandex.ru, H*UA:Home
X-HELO: smtp.ht-systems.ru
Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2016 01:12:03 +0300
From: Andrey Repin <anrdaemon AT yandex DOT ru>
Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Message-ID: <371250572.20160217011203@yandex.ru>
To: waterlan <waterlan AT xs4all DOT nl>, cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] dosbox 0.74-2
In-Reply-To: <ff5e28c6cf943b50a37d98819a47032c@xs4all.nl>
References: <announce DOT 201602151713 DOT u1FHDlA5021662 AT int-mx13 DOT intmail DOT prod DOT int DOT phx2 DOT redhat DOT com>   <56C229DA DOT 9060700 AT xs4all DOT nl> <56C2311D DOT 404 AT cygwin DOT com>  <ea13ddc3b75eb9016e943d18de98daf3 AT xs4all DOT nl> <56C26740 DOT 7000802 AT cygwin DOT com>  <fa2851e3f965744a19c34929676b75e5 AT xs4all DOT nl>  <773770423 DOT 20160216204742 AT yandex DOT ru>  <ff5e28c6cf943b50a37d98819a47032c AT xs4all DOT nl>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-IsSubscribed: yes

Greetings, waterlan!

> Andrey Repin schreef op 2016-02-16 18:47:
>> Greetings, waterlan!
>> 
>>>>> I run DosBOX-win32 directly on 64 bit Windows. No need for a Cygwin
>>>>> POSIX layer here.
>>>> 
>>>> You could say the same of many packages.  If you want to run MinGW or
>>>> MSYS, go right ahead.  If you want to use Cygwin as an environment in
>>>> and of its own, then the more packages therein the better.
>> 
>>> I agree with you, but I can't see the advantage for DosBOX.
>> 
>> I don't see a disadvantage either. So, what was your problem, again?
>> It is not like anyone forcing you to install it, right?

> I don't have a problem with it. I was only wondering if anyone would use 
> it.

I would. I have a few programs (namely BP compiler) I need for my old
projects. Running VM is not always a fastest option.


-- 
With best regards,
Andrey Repin
Wednesday, February 17, 2016 01:11:01

Sorry for my terrible english...


--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple