X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:mime-version:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to
	:references:message-id; q=dns; s=default; b=I1CJ4OJjniMvyvbacIW0
	S86J/HKey/1R8pB9115ZB5fG8vM2q3LgjxQK59w6OGX9OHIk8eGGR6Ip5NaHwafd
	eRPcr6ywftBBHqoLOgZmkhNYdBsdddsFpKy6JYoeRQy1aUYUT1vzn920ZEPQvuYk
	0uEe90+xLwEbzAYCm58r4c4=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:mime-version:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to
	:references:message-id; s=default; bh=fc++aECcoRyqP0IaEp9LXS4LcW
	A=; b=tBU+XkbB6JU4mf217gt0i/4qi+g8LBQGaPVDBvwe/OgoXw5hdm5EE0rwr4
	mp8PhzZ5wy9W9Ym+aXJbLVcvHQQt3pzaY8LsOiOMttYOlWy9/tf+qmLEJSE9hAy5
	/oGODZF2sH+z3YPrPvhJwFfp/bu2TkLLTok+lX/Bc6lqIcinI=
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=disadvantage, waterlan!, H*i:sk:7737704, H*f:sk:7737704
X-HELO: lb3-smtp-cloud6.xs4all.net
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2016 20:36:12 +0100
From: waterlan <waterlan AT xs4all DOT nl>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] dosbox 0.74-2
In-Reply-To: <773770423.20160216204742@yandex.ru>
References: <announce DOT 201602151713 DOT u1FHDlA5021662 AT int-mx13 DOT intmail DOT prod DOT int DOT phx2 DOT redhat DOT com> <56C229DA DOT 9060700 AT xs4all DOT nl> <56C2311D DOT 404 AT cygwin DOT com> <ea13ddc3b75eb9016e943d18de98daf3 AT xs4all DOT nl> <56C26740 DOT 7000802 AT cygwin DOT com> <fa2851e3f965744a19c34929676b75e5 AT xs4all DOT nl> <773770423 DOT 20160216204742 AT yandex DOT ru>
Message-ID: <ff5e28c6cf943b50a37d98819a47032c@xs4all.nl>
X-Sender: waterlan AT xs4all DOT nl (jvg2NzuPlKIuwhQ+/vE38TENUytLk2Ny)
User-Agent: XS4ALL Webmail
X-IsSubscribed: yes

Andrey Repin schreef op 2016-02-16 18:47:
> Greetings, waterlan!
> 
>>>> I run DosBOX-win32 directly on 64 bit Windows. No need for a Cygwin
>>>> POSIX layer here.
>>> 
>>> You could say the same of many packages.  If you want to run MinGW or
>>> MSYS, go right ahead.  If you want to use Cygwin as an environment in
>>> and of its own, then the more packages therein the better.
> 
>> I agree with you, but I can't see the advantage for DosBOX.
> 
> I don't see a disadvantage either. So, what was your problem, again?
> It is not like anyone forcing you to install it, right?

I don't have a problem with it. I was only wondering if anyone would use 
it.


-- 
Erwin

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple