X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject
	:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
	 q=dns; s=default; b=NKr7Cp8qzGtxGEJQdzLpEKUeFClWC1YYWCpEltJcpFa
	yifxv8yB+uXHn3b5fCtDMWz77XtYm/BZGy0XEJYFEJoN4EemHNglGDoWTulZM76l
	dMnKVfj2lSK+ox2/u8FGQaA8GArihqwe4qsh/D1QmwAef/3j6HzZwHczO8Gz3nY0
	=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject
	:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
	 s=default; bh=TeAYk/DvkvRc2hmO3MdbmyqMi4c=; b=EAgp71p/Zyg9wu9Gw
	pgD9gQBHKSo4Is2MmYTnH/FdCU4vhczZw+dKN6/O+ug0aRA8+KPfDQ1mmgPq7zi7
	6B5GSD5jz4zIpFaXowShuga+hbPzpiMru4cPJaUzJJCYY68NHGVLogk1gICyfxQR
	eAnW26ljUInIFv+8N74N7zNTmU=
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=sincerely, H*F:D*se, dirty
X-HELO: mail.lysator.liu.se
Message-ID: <56B9BBBD.1030809@lysator.liu.se>
Date: Tue, 09 Feb 2016 11:13:17 +0100
From: Peter Rosin <peda AT lysator DOT liu DOT se>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; Win64; x64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: Problem with new acl code and cdrtools
References: <CAFo71_4fDB3WkhXTL7eybNzKh2idVF1UHb7oJjaxFshcS9BFUg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <20160208131835 DOT GC12975 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <CAFo71_5=KT=kJY-wz0EZWZ_LBriCjX2s6=5PSVhHRSxx-A92qg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <56B8C25F DOT 7050206 AT lysator DOT liu DOT se> <CAFo71_4eQ2VMypAnC=Bx_bvbzGvVCs=jj4r9Ax6GDbgaH1zGOQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <CA0C06F1-A50D-4DBF-AB58-AADCE3D9F9F4 AT etr-usa DOT com> <CAFo71_58PFDgaNU4-bdj4JoCndXAd=+i57w_eAgeq==RVcyoDw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <56B9A9D8 DOT 1030900 AT lysator DOT liu DOT se> <CAFo71_7Q4C73ec_ULtBESxg5Q1P-QmLxHCQYqjfssQKDt4HxZA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
In-Reply-To: <CAFo71_7Q4C73ec_ULtBESxg5Q1P-QmLxHCQYqjfssQKDt4HxZA@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit



On 2016-02-09 10:06, Ismail Donmez wrote:
> Hi Peter,
> 
> On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 10:56 AM, Peter Rosin <peda AT lysator DOT liu DOT se> wrote:
>> My take on the situation was that you could disable SUN ACLs by telling
>> configure that cdrtools should not use aclfromtext(), and that the code
>> that backs this was already in place. I.e. that you could get a working
>> build recipe w/o any hacking/patching of cdrtools at all.
>>
>> I might be misunderstanding something though, but if it works and if
>> it is considered more of an hack than introducing a cygwin version
>> check inside the cdrtools package, then that's not my headache.
>>
>> Just trying to help...
> 
> If my reply came out as rude, I am sincerely sorry. As you said yes
> this would be a way to fix the situation for Cygwin, but I would be
> more happy with a pre-processor macro which we can use for this.

I didn't think it rude, but it is clear that we disagree about what is
a dirty hack and what is generic. Disagreeing isn't necessarily rude :-)

Cheers,
Peter

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple