X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:content-type:mime-version:subject:from :in-reply-to:date:content-transfer-encoding:message-id :references:to; q=dns; s=default; b=NATMN1OIoV+KQIgxfxdHJr2+YToD 5KXyKY/7RRp6S1LQFrTULHJxUrudQWmrXtvsTCuxPC3hFbwquzMQ1+Nfjjw7MrbC At6mUO4jRvRrj1K6H8Xg4Q8taaBZ1PTFOO084x3vkUccosuoWLySLT0u89PXu13o NrmbYcyc6V8fLxM= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:content-type:mime-version:subject:from :in-reply-to:date:content-transfer-encoding:message-id :references:to; s=default; bh=G5HNGjLRY5sP/1McYgzZ7URtbxI=; b=ID In7XUTGRuGCiXBFBGB3pL0Tz6MkadIZ3dBDatcNg3oq/MDB8RzQDVO+9oPmJPbr1 +9nPi36X0cwPH03iCOI/sgw58HfiqVBplFNz3z8Fuo/lN0LqJKNWKcXoBdlMtL2y ib8ZenoXj5WMi4q2T35nWdkAgkShiEtLOGAEUN+SM= Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=1.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=no version=3.3.2 spammy=H*i:sk:CAFo71_, H*MI:sk:56B8C25, H*MI:sk:CA0C06F, H*m:usa X-HELO: etr-usa.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2104\)) Subject: Re: Problem with new acl code and cdrtools From: Warren Young In-Reply-To: Date: Tue, 9 Feb 2016 01:46:32 -0700 Message-Id: References: <20160208131835 DOT GC12975 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <56B8C25F DOT 7050206 AT lysator DOT liu DOT se> To: The Cygwin Mailing List X-IsSubscribed: yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id u198kmlY014422 On Feb 9, 2016, at 12:56 AM, Ismail Donmez wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 6:14 AM, Warren Young wrote: >> On Feb 8, 2016, at 9:59 AM, Ismail Donmez wrote: >>> >>> Thats a hack :) >> >> Peter’s proposal is as far from a hack as it gets. > > What Peter suggests is telling autoconf to assume aclfromtext() does > not exist on the system which is a hack and I already have a hack I > could use. No. Once again, he’s suggesting that you write a *test* that checks whether aclfromtext() exists here. Hypothesis -> test -> decision is science, not assumption or hackery. >> #include >> #if HAVE_FUNC_ACLFROMTEXT >> # include >> #endif > > I could check for __cygwin__ instead of that which would do the same thing. Not if it’s Cygwin 1.7.34. -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple