X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date
	:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=default; b=GWcOyY9shM9X27E+
	zgEEc5sPtiXAlzbj0QSCal0GK8RtyL85JFKr8abxYjtiVP7N3cD3/2UoFjSe1SM1
	rqU+bgVnzKbOFwmO/Zpxam2HSrpYxSMtr49we0CnGyzw9uRCfr4IHQuz31jFlJq5
	B9lDBm0SLcAU7ZTeZ+/4vT3IeQ8=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date
	:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=m7loDiFuXZ5DsPHtnEIhC4
	N8sXs=; b=si1s5wTJnSD4lFsobN4yVKIFp4QDX/R/Jy+3rde1iuxvdn+vl52qDy
	B43yBG3gKa/k4S1/maeXj/GkJxg4GyKtzHWqkRqkt9n//YxAhgHgALykKCUhG5Va
	rgKbvY+f8BoYJW5qycdkRFBTGEqMJwoRggGfGwVnD+LXcSKUOO21w=
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=no version=3.3.2 spammy=H*M:cygwin, H*Ad:U*yselkowitz
X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com
Subject: Re: Problem with new acl code and cdrtools
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References: <CAFo71_4fDB3WkhXTL7eybNzKh2idVF1UHb7oJjaxFshcS9BFUg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <20160208131835 DOT GC12975 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <CAFo71_5=KT=kJY-wz0EZWZ_LBriCjX2s6=5PSVhHRSxx-A92qg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <20160208141015 DOT GD12975 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de>
From: Yaakov Selkowitz <yselkowitz AT cygwin DOT com>
Message-ID: <56B8EB73.8090900@cygwin.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2016 13:24:35 -0600
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20160208141015.GD12975@calimero.vinschen.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-IsSubscribed: yes

On 2016-02-08 08:10, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> Alternatively we could allow to use the Solaris ACL functions even if
> only including sys/acl.h, given some macro:
>
>    sys/acl.h:
>
>      #ifdef __USE_OLD_SOLARIS_ACL_FUNCTIONS
>      # include <cygwin/acl.h>
>      #else
>        [...POSIX definitions...]
>      #endif

Do the functions or typedefs conflict in any way?

-- 
Yaakov

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple