X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=default; b=PEwURwPF06y9DuE1xKyjimNVM5gtKL1mdBwR2+DJivP UwXb5cboG38reyBm2T4Ja/CJ1CaNbDYc9GcVcwVYjjviheqJS3bsWhiGJOnURr8E X6xwqB8KPTAM8TCwNMBOQDFatxjNgRLXH6C2pkVXgCqRA+lgvgFTcMOtp+d9KJRg = DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=vJm9bsOVHG/SW4yhzzcxf+JUehY=; b=eH4/a00JDozYr88JN nawu8v9XmSjQxHRJ0KaQqeIYrOuCpcyOo6yfP/wD+aAkHmIg0NLkAnuolOOs0atz 31zJV4Oc/HJ0EoPYqtIUZHXxBI2pfLuedJCS1atty42ybYzfEXVsF2oFK7RCLVTR kUEBQ2VHdYiS4n1C4J2lodRlgk= Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_40,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=H*MI:sk:kJY-wz0, H*MI:sk:5PSVhHR, pardon, H*i:sk:kJY-wz0 X-HELO: mail.lysator.liu.se Message-ID: <56B8C25F.7050206@lysator.liu.se> Date: Mon, 08 Feb 2016 17:29:19 +0100 From: Peter Rosin User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; Win64; x64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Problem with new acl code and cdrtools References: <20160208131835 DOT GC12975 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 2016-02-08 14:31, Ismail Donmez wrote: > This is a generic code so I don't want to add a cygwin specific > dependency there. Is there a preprocessor definition for cygwin > version? I could use that to disable HAVE_SUN_ACL for cygwin 2.5+ Pardon me for butting in, but isn't adding a Cygwin version check about as non-generic as it gets? Wouldn't something like this work: .../configure ac_cv_func_aclfromtext=no Cheers, Peter -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple