X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:to:from:subject:date:message-id:references :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s= default; b=iDq1qzMo9MoxmWkt9NG4UZP2WLN7HEXkdSlAo/TEqiijF2vqHWr/A 1PdS55dmy2eGpG+UvIzzcKvsJ91fg8ltwvP9HesCb5Og5PdJKw1IhNUPmDgPtGZa J6mo6v74sZvopMRPFU5u2799aV5YZp2bv9l88kukvcQyFE3tWuuB8Q= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:to:from:subject:date:message-id:references :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=7lNU4SnRYALMirBzw2liyqmStvQ=; b=QpeQdu2zTEeYQYgRDFhOqAcWi18g +0OoGyxv6LJbb9ZdPfWjpk3AhGaNlFkzy85kh8ZfLOGW9L8hTQlHK7DsqjeSql/P kzKSHwNl7/lmv8YgUK+LlRdjZomH2qvPtxtq4luY8xFRGqijjNQpVkguqVQTQY2J +KNpU0OmRdwdUy8= Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=H*f:sk:CAOYw7d, she, tonight X-HELO: plane.gmane.org To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com From: Henri Subject: Re: =?utf-8?b?Y3lnd2luX2NvbnZfcGF0aA==?= sometimes removes trailing slash Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2016 10:59:43 +0000 (UTC) Lines: 18 Message-ID: References: <56AC2C35 DOT 9060903 AT cornell DOT edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: Loom/3.14 (http://gmane.org/) X-IsSubscribed: yes Ray Donnelly gmail.com> writes: > I can't check as I'm at work, but to the best of my knowledge (and yes > I wrote these a long time ago) path_conv::check is used in conversions > both ways so I am talking about both cases here, Jan's with the first > patch and Ken's with the second patch. Please do correct me if I am > wrong though! I will run some detailed tests tonight. As I wrote to Ken (private e-mail), let us wait for Corinna: she knows all the nooks and crannies here ... As far as I can tell, path_conv::check() is invoked for posix -> win32 only; that is, in cygwin_conv_path() (winsup/cygwin/path.cc). But, again, let us wait for Corinna. Regards, Henri -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple