X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:from:to:in-reply-to:subject:date:message-id :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s= default; b=YN3lNm6JCCRZGRBssTSvr3cm6A99dx8rEu9XYhveI43zGOwGv8PPh +mBfvfnc9pTXn4T3XmtiEguATxIshG3/+GorKL9DsQ14eWCnp+AO1FMwZiUHEthW Sw0B1zCTzE8h5ftbegBWdShJMZkd2MYeqhRcVI2fBcncHC4wSodcTM= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:from:to:in-reply-to:subject:date:message-id :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=OmHhyLwQmosjry/XR+P3Y+tAnTs=; b=w2xHlD0m+bBKl6+U6/hinj/Sx4Dw gTJA68sj4L2okiJhr7qWDmctINGBPL5TkQP6VQGHWbXV0ahdjsuRv1wXZE0ITkNJ i//m4UWAKixb8GKLbsF+eQsQ3mP76/lE0qG19pUUBlJZCIgcfdHS2FLrR3ZDPJXx rmULoR2rIrH6Wrw= Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=1.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50,KAM_COUK,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=no version=3.3.2 spammy=H*x:Build, H*UA:Build, HX-MSMail-Priority:Normal, H*F:D*demon.co.uk X-HELO: smtp.demon.co.uk From: "Roger Orr" To: In-Reply-To: Subject: RE: Compiling gcc trunk under cygwin Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2016 00:16:07 -0000 Message-ID: <7949D676FC124BC4BF6B23D4DFDBDDF2@Tamar> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-MDF-HostID: 9 FYI (1) Revision 232071 problem The pr66655 has a new proposed patch, which does appear to build on cygwin, and is awaiting final approval. See https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66655 (2) Revision 232454 problem I've now reported the revision 232454 problem as pr69506 (as it's been well over a week since the problematic check-in) See https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69506 Regards, Roger. -----Original Message----- From: Roger Orr [mailto:rogero AT howzatt DOT demon DOT co DOT uk] Sent: 23 January 2016 14:19 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Compiling gcc trunk under cygwin David Wohlferd LimeGreenSocks.com> writes: > Until recently, I've been able to build gcc under cygwin just fine. But > (relatively) recent checkins (232454 & 232071) are causing problems. Have you reported the problems with 232454 to gcc yet? I've already reported the 232071 problem, on the original bug report this was trying to fix. See gcc's bugzilla: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66655 Roger. -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple