X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; q=dns; s=default; b=H2BA 4PfjAfvyCLNvRlHNpf1ywqFitmZ4ktFsKEyLbUwuQXmXrSKDZyyiuCHJ2j+BErbc tYj3mx4QOXfE6c0oirO7tZyW9hRUh8p7/8kHIOUm104/QJ+iYs0LnCbhflvtXAGl WklKo6SGz9XBfhAK3tZOzmFM2rRVrbknpkKVGjk= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; s=default; bh=4gwNwFr9IN 7y9L+NymWt9mJb4/4=; b=YtkG3PCVDT4ezAs3H1vzZQNvRB0nG00mZLDogBEgqd OmImblabCpjBXWaF0RQ5iCmCXAdVuA7OKO3edSKg5fkwuYaV2LJFenz9JdMc8QWT SKtIxs0EeabcDPqOclP579E5hI9BuWi76wG12obCOu/BgQU3c3lyLsGTFjQA7Dnp M= Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=1.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=no version=3.3.2 spammy=pride, pre-dates, predates, __strict_ansi__ X-HELO: mail110.syd.optusnet.com.au Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2016 15:51:05 +1100 From: Duncan Roe To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: bcftools error running Make after installing update 2.4.1.1 to Cygwin64 Message-ID: <20160126045105.GA15234@dimstar.local.net> Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <56A693F5 DOT 7070000 AT tiscali DOT co DOT uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <56A693F5.7070000@tiscali.co.uk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.22 (2013-10-16) X-Optus-CM-Score: 0 X-Optus-CM-Analysis: v=2.1 cv=R4L+YolX c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=+cDhJlqnNvz9E7c5l3ERGg==:117 a=+cDhJlqnNvz9E7c5l3ERGg==:17 a=L9H7d07YOLsA:10 a=9cW_t1CCXrUA:10 a=s5jvgZ67dGcA:10 a=eIhxMilvRf8A:10 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=7aQ_Q-yQQ-AA:10 a=FRQSvaR4Lw90OAh44SkA:9 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 X-IsSubscribed: yes On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 09:30:29PM +0000, David Stacey wrote: > On 25/01/16 21:00, Robert May wrote: > >many warnings are given in the following text - see end for error message > > > >echo '#define BCFTOOLS_VERSION "1.3"'> version.h > >gcc -g -Wall -Wc++-compat -O2 -std=c99 -I. -Ihtslib-1.3 -DPLUGINPATH=\"/usr/local/libexec/bcftools\" -c -o main.o main.c > >gcc -g -Wall -Wc++-compat -O2 -std=c99 -I. -Ihtslib-1.3 -DPLUGINPATH=\"/usr/local/libexec/bcftools\" -c -o vcfindex.o vcfindex.c > >vcfindex.c: In function ?main_vcfindex?: > >vcfindex.c:209:9: warning: implicit declaration of function ?alloca? [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] > > char*idx_fname = (char*)alloca(strlen(fname) + 5); > > ^ > >vcfindex.c:209:27: warning: cast to pointer from integer of different size [-Wint-to-pointer-cast] > > char*idx_fname = (char*)alloca(strlen(fname) + 5); > > These warnings can be generated for a number of reasons. One is that the > source code you are attempting to compile pre-dates this version of gcc. > Another reason is that you are somehow using a combination of compiler > switches that were never expected. A third reason is that the source code > simply isn't well written, but the majority of Open Source contributors take > great pride in their work. > > In your case, it could be the compiler switches - see below. > > >gcc -g -Wall -Wc++-compat -O2 -std=c99 -I. -Ihtslib-1.3 -DPLUGINPATH=\"/usr/local/libexec/bcftools\" -c -o vcfcnv.o vcfcnv.c > >vcfcnv.c: In function ?norm_prob?: > >vcfcnv.c:602:93: error: ?M_PI? undeclared (first use in this function) > > return exp(-(baf-param->mean)*(baf-param->mean)*0.5/param->dev2) / param->norm / sqrt(2*M_PI*param->dev2); > > ^ > >vcfcnv.c:602:93: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in > >vcfcnv.c: In function ?main_vcfcnv?: > >vcfcnv.c:1349:9: warning: implicit declaration of function ?fileno? [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] > > if ( !isatty(fileno((FILE *)stdin)) ) fname = "-"; > > ^ > >vcfcnv.c: In function ?norm_prob?: > >vcfcnv.c:603:1: warning: control reaches end of non-void function [-Wreturn-type] > > } > > ^ > > This looks like expected behaviour to me. Specifying '-std=c99' defines a > __STRICT_ANSI__ macro, which in turn means that mathematical constants like > M_PI are not defined. Using '-std=gnu99' instead should work. You may also > find that this more relaxed compiler setting doesn't generate so many > warnings. > > Dave. > Definitely you need a gnu standard for /usr/include/alloca.h to make alloca visible. It is not a POSIX function. Cheers ... Duncan. -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple